atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Evaluating Robustness of Predictive Uncertainty Estimation: Are Dirichlet-based Models Reliable?

ICML 2021 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Theory of adversarial risk · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply PGD label attacks with increasing radiusDBU models · CIFAR10 and SensorlessAUC-PR for identifying correct vs. wrong predictions: 98.7 -> 0.4; 99.9 -> 3.2Hurt
Apply PGD label attacks to inputsDBU models using uncertainty for attack detection · CIFAR10 and SensorlessAUC-PR, label attack detection: CIFAR10 PostNet: 63.4 at radius 0.1; Sensorless PostNet: 85.0 at radius 2.0Mixed
Apply PGD uncertainty attacks to ID or OOD inputsDBU models using differential entropy · CIFAR10–SVHNAUC-PR, OOD detection: DDNet ID attack: 82.8 -> 15.4; OOD attack: 82.8 -> 15.4Hurt
Use median smoothing on uncertainty scoresDBU models · CIFAR10: correct-vs-wrong prediction, attack detection, and OOD detectionAUC-PR robustnessHelped
Add adversarial training using PGD label or uncertainty attacksSmoothed DBU models · CIFAR10 robustness tasksAUC-PR robustnessNo clear effect
Train PriorNet with OOD dataPriorNet · Label attack robustnessAccuracy under label attacksHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy