atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / MDPs and planning

Double Reinforcement Learning for Efficient and Robust Off-Policy Evaluation

ICML 2020 · Reinforcement learning › MDPs and planning · approach: Average-reward and regularized MDPs

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DRL (MDP) estimator (cross-fit q and marginal density ratio) instead of IS/DM/MIS baselinesOPE in MDPs · Cliff Walking and Mountain CarRMSEHelped
Marginalized density ratio estimator (MIS) instead of per-step ISCliff Walking · Cliff WalkingRMSE: e.g. 18.8 -> 12.8 at n=500Helped
Marginalized density ratio estimator (MIS) instead of per-step ISMountain Car · Mountain CarRMSE: 6.85 -> 6.82 at n=500No clear effect
Cross-fit DRL with NMDP nuisances (cumulative density ratio) vs. MDP-structured DRLDRL estimator · Cliff Walking and Mountain CarRMSE: DRL(NMDP) worse than DRL(MDP) in every settingHurt
Direct method (DM) baseline in Cliff WalkingDM · Cliff WalkingRMSE: beats IS/MIS but worse than DRL(MDP) at all sizesMixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy