Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses
Statistical Foundations of Virtual Democracy
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use Borda count rule instead of PMC rules for aggregating noisy predicted rankings | virtual democracy aggregation · theoretical robustness analysis | probability of flipping pair under noisy predictions | Helped |
| Increase true Borda score difference between two alternatives | Borda count · Mallows simulation (n=100, m=40, p=1) | average error probability of flipping pair | Helped |
| Increase Mallows noise parameter phi (noisier predictions) | Borda count · Mallows simulation (n=100, m=40, p=1) | maximum observed error rate | Hurt |
Closest papers by meaning
- Explainable Voting (NeurIPS 2020 · similarity 0.89)
- Can We Predict the Election Outcome from Sampled Votes? (AAAI 2020 · similarity 0.86)
- Proportional Aggregation of Preferences for Sequential Decision Making (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.86)
- Solving Seven Open Problems of Offline and Online Control in Borda Elections (AAAI 2017 · similarity 0.86)
- Dimensionality and Coordination in Voting: The Distortion of STV (AAAI 2022 · similarity 0.86)
- Computing Voting Rules with Improvement Feedback (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.84)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.