AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Rapid Adaptation with Conditionally Shifted Neurons

ICML 2018 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Brain-inspired network comparison · 121 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ResNet rather than CNN as the base architecture with conditional shiftsadaCNN/adaResNet · Mini-ImageNet 5-way 1-shotaccuracy: 48.34 ± 0.68 -> 56.88 ± 0.62Helped
Use ResNet rather than CNN as the base architecture with conditional shiftsadaCNN/adaResNet · Mini-ImageNet 5-way 5-shotaccuracy: 62.00 ± 0.55 -> 71.94 ± 0.57Helped
Replace gradient conditioning with direct feedback conditioningadaResNet · Mini-ImageNet 5-way 1-shotaccuracy: 56.62 ± 0.69 -> 56.88 ± 0.62No clear effect
Replace gradient conditioning with direct feedback conditioningadaResNet · Mini-ImageNet 5-way 5-shotaccuracy: 71.69 ± 0.67 -> 71.94 ± 0.57Hurt
Adapt the recurrent LSTM with task-specific shifts rather than adapting only an output feed-forward networkPTB few-shot models · Penn Treebank 5-way few-shot language modelingaccuracy: 2-layer LSTM + adaFFN (∇): 32.55/33.2, 44.15/46.0, 50.4/51.7; 2-layer adaLSTM (∇): 43.1/43.0, 52.05/54.2, 57.35/58.4Helped
Increase the adaLSTM depth from one layer to twoadaLSTM · Penn Treebank few-shot language modelingaccuracy: 1-layer adaLSTM (∇): 36.55/37.7, 43.25/44.6, 50.7/52.1; 2-layer adaLSTM (∇): 43.1/43.0, 52.05/54.2, 57.35/58.4Helped
Add more labeled support examples for the target word2-layer adaLSTM · Penn Treebank few-shot language modelingaccuracy: 43.1/43.0 -> 52.05/54.2 -> 57.35/58.4Helped
Use direct feedback rather than gradient conditioning2-layer adaLSTM · Penn Treebank few-shot language modelingruntime: 200 seconds vs. 160 secondsHelped
Remove the nonlinearity applied to the conditional shift (ablation)adaCNN and adaLSTM · Mini-ImageNet one-shot and PTB one-shotaccuracy: around 7%Hurt
Add the conditional shift to pre-activations inside the nonlinearity (ablation)adaCNN and adaLSTM · Mini-ImageNet one-shot and PTB one-shotaccuracy: 47.8%; 48.09%; 30.7/31.8%; 33.25/34.05%Mixed
Replace the learned MLP and gradient preprocessing with a learned scalar multiplying the raw gradient (ablation)gradient-conditioned adaCNN and adaLSTM · Mini-ImageNet one-shot and PTB one-shotaccuracy: about 3 percentage points; 20%Hurt
Replace the deep mapping function with a one-layer perceptron for direct-feedback information (ablation)DF-conditioned adaCNN and adaLSTM · Mini-ImageNet and PTB few-shot tasksaccuracy: over 10%Hurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy