atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Feature-Space Bayesian Adversarial Learning Improved Malware Detector Robustness

AAAI 2023 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Attack evaluation and defense critique · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use Bayesian adversarial training instead of adversarial FFNN trainingMalware detector · SOREL-20M and EMBER, PGD attacksrobustness: SOREL-20M, budget 0.1: 47.74 -> 62.86; EMBER, budget 0.1: 64.00 -> 78.03Helped
Use Bayesian neural networks instead of FFNNsMalware detector · SOREL-20M, no attacks, low-FPR regimesdetection rate: up to 20%Helped
Adversarially train the detector on feature-space adversarial examplesMalware detector · Problem-space Sets A and Brobustness: Set A, Adv-FFNN: 69.5% -> 92.6%; Adv-MalBayes: 72.5% -> 99.9%; Set B, Adv-FFNN: 74.9% -> 91.8%; Adv-MalBayes: 83.1% -> 9Helped
Train Adv-MalBayes with PGD L∞Adv-MalBayes · FGSM attacks at budgets 0.03–0.3robustness: 95.28; 94.87; 95.24; 93.78; 92.20Helped
Increase the number of parameter particles (ablation)Bayesian neural network · Malware detection robustnessrobustnessHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy