atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels

Loss factorization, weakly supervised learning and label noise robustness

ICML 2016 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Noisy labels · approach: Instance-dependent noise modeling · 41 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the mean-operator estimator and doubled-sample update instead of vanilla SGDLogistic-loss SGD · UCI datasets with asymmetric label noise, (p_-, p_+) = (.20,.49)test error difference vs SGD: Australian $\bm{-.25}$; breast-can. $\bm{-.08}$; diabetes $\bm{-.22}$; heart $\bm{-.15}$; housing $\bm{-.13}$; ionospherHelped
Use the mean-operator estimator and doubled-sample update instead of vanilla SGDLogistic-loss SGD · UCI datasets with no label noise, (p_-, p_+) = (.00,.00)test error difference vs SGD: australian $+.01$; diabetes $\bm{-.03}$; sonar $\pm.00$No clear effect
Estimate the mean operator with the asymmetric-noise correctionLinear-odd-loss empirical risk minimization · Asymmetric label noiseexpected empirical l-risk biasHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy