Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Pruning and efficient tuning
LUM-ViT: Learnable Under-sampling Mask Vision Transformer for Bandwidth Limited Optical Signal Acquisition
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes LUM-ViT, a ViT whose patch-embedding is a learnable under-sampling mask applied to DMD-based optical computation with kernel-level binarized weights and a three-stage fine-tuning strategy, enabling pre-acquisition optical modulation of hyperspectral/image data.
Problem
Bandwidth constraints during signal acquisition impede real-time detection, especially for hyperspectral data whose volume is huge; compressive sensing performs poorly at low under-sampling rates and cannot exploit prior knowledge of the target.
Approach
Replace the ViT patch-embedding with a DMD-compatible single-channel binarized convolution whose (patch, kernel) outputs are gated by a learnable binary mask trained with Gumbel-Softmax and a rate loss, so only retained points are optically acquired; weights are binarized per kernel and training is split into three stages.
Key results
- At 10% under-sampling LUM-ViT keeps accuracy loss within 1.8% on ImageNet-1k; at 2% the loss stays under 5.5%.
- Real-world DMD experiment on LUM-ViT-2%: 64.4% accuracy on 7-color e-ink display (74.7% excluding device-induced anomalies) vs. 75.7% for MAE-base under the same 7-color conversion.
- Hyperspectral classification overall accuracy after mask: 86.2% Indian Pines, 88.6% Pavia University, 99.1% Salinas.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use LUM-ViT with a 2% mask and DMD hardware | LUM-ViT · ImageNet-1k, RGB | Top-1 accuracy: 78.3 -> 74.7 | Mixed |
| Apply a 2% mask with DMD hardware | LUM-ViT · ImageNet-1k, 7-color | Top-1 accuracy: 69.1 -> 64.4 | Mixed |
| Apply the mask | LUM-ViT · Indian Pines | Overall accuracy: 87.4 -> 86.2 | Hurt |
| Apply the mask | LUM-ViT · Pavia University | Overall accuracy: 89.5 -> 88.6 | Hurt |
| Apply the mask | LUM-ViT · Salinas | Overall accuracy: 99.4 & 99.1 | Hurt |
| Replace kernel-level with full-layer binarization (ablation) | LUM-ViT · ImageNet-1k, LUM-ViT-10% | Top-1 accuracy after binarization: 81.9 -> 81.3 | Hurt |
| Replace learnable-token substitution with zero assignment to masked points (ablation) | LUM-ViT · ImageNet-1k, LUM-ViT-10% | Top-1 accuracy after binarization: 81.9 -> 81.7 | Hurt |
| Replace MSE with L1-norm for mask training (ablation) | LUM-ViT · ImageNet-1k, LUM-ViT-10% | Top-1 accuracy after binarization: 81.9 -> 80.0 | Hurt |
| Remove the Linear layer after mask parameters (ablation) | LUM-ViT · ImageNet-1k, LUM-ViT-10% | Top-1 accuracy after binarization: 81.9 -> 79.4 | Hurt |
| Use a learnable mask rather than random or magnitude-based masking | LUM-ViT · ImageNet-1k | Top-1 accuracy | Helped |
| Use the three-stage training strategy rather than joint training | LUM-ViT · ImageNet-1k | Top-1 accuracy | Helped |
Surprising findings
- Full-layer binarization degraded accuracy less than expected only by about 0.6 points; the paper emphasizes kernel-level binarization is needed to keep performance.
- Attempts to train the binary layer and mask concurrently were unsuccessful, requiring a three-stage schedule.
Limitations
- Mask is fixed after training and must be determined before target acquisition; no dynamic masking.
- Requires model adaptation (reconfigured channel weights and fine-tuning) to move from RGB to hyperspectral/7-color hardware.
- Real-world experiment uses only 371 ImageNet test images and a 7-color e-ink display, with a 4-5% hardware-induced drop.
Experimental setup
Datasets: ImageNet-1k Indian Pines Pavia University Salinas
Benchmarks: ImageNet-1k Indian Pines Pavia University Salinas
Metrics: Top-1 accuracy overall accuracy
Baselines: DU-ViT Random-mask-ViT Mag-mask-ViT CS-method (OMP reconstruction + ViT) MAE-base
Builds on: Vision Transformer MAE Gumbel-Softmax DynamicViT AdaViT
Closest papers by meaning
- LF-ViT: Reducing Spatial Redundancy in Vision Transformer for Efficient Image Recognition (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.83)
- LESSViT: Robust Hyperspectral Representation Learning under Spectral Configuration Shift (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.83)
- Bi-ViT: Pushing the Limit of Vision Transformer Quantization (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.83)
- ExPLoRA: Parameter-Efficient Extended Pre-Training to Adapt Vision Transformers under Domain Shifts (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.82)
- Luminance-Aware Statistical Quantization: Unsupervised Hierarchical Learning for Illumination Enhancement (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.82)
- SPECAT: SPatial-spEctral Cumulative-Attention Transformer for High-Resolution Hyperspectral Image Reconstruction (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.82)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
