atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Are Models Biased on Text without Gender-related Language?

ICLR 2024 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: Bias measurement and mitigation · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces UnStereoEval, a PMI-based framework and ChatGPT-generated benchmarks that test whether 28 LMs show gender preferences on stereotype-free sentences, finding fairness of only 9%-41%.

Problem

Gender bias in language models is usually measured on stereotypical sentences whose bias is attributed to gendered training correlations; it is unclear whether models remain fair in non-stereotypical, gender-neutral settings.

Approach

Filter sentences so that every word has minimal PMI-based gender co-occurrence in the pretraining corpus (The Pile), generate gender-invariant sentence pairs with ChatGPT around seed words, and measure the fraction of pairs where the LM's log-likelihood gap is within a threshold (Unstereo Score).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Evaluate language models on stereotype-free sentence pairs28 tested language models · USE 5, Winobias, Winogender, and other benchmarksUnstereo Score: 9%–41% fairnessHurt
Reduce the maximum allowed gender-correlation threshold to η=0.65language models evaluated on USE 5 · USE 5Unstereo Score fairness gap: |Δ0.65| ≤ 1.33%No clear effect
Increase model sizesix language-model families · gender-bias benchmarksUnstereo ScoreNo clear effect
Deduplicate pretraining data (ablation)Pyth models · USE 5, USE 10, USE 20, Winobias, and WinogenderUnstereo Score: 6.73; -17.14; 9.35Mixed
Evaluate in filtered Winobias and Winogenderall evaluated models · Winobias and Winogendergender preference disparity: greater than 40%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: The Pile Winobias Winogender

Benchmarks: USE-5 USE-10 USE-20 Winobias Winogender

Metrics: Unstereo Score fairness gap preference disparity AuFC

Baselines: Winobias Winogender BUG

Builds on: Winobias Winogender The Pile

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy