atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Bridging Neural and Symbolic Representations with Transitional Dictionary Learning

ICLR 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Contrastive representation theory · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Transitional Dictionary Learning, a game-theoretic diffusion model with EM-style online prototype clustering and PPO tuning, that learns part and relation dictionaries unsupervised and outperforms unsupervised part segmentation baselines on abstract compositional datasets.

Problem

Learning symbolic-like compositional representations (visual parts and implicit relations) from abstract visual objects that lack distinct visual features, where existing unsupervised part segmentation methods fail.

Approach

Decompose inputs into visual parts with a game-theoretic diffusion model (players with overlap, resource and norm penalties), and learn reusable 1-ary and 2-ary predicate dictionaries via EM-style online prototype clustering, optionally tuned with PPO using a heuristic shape-score reward.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add clustering loss to the decomposition-only model (ablation)TDL · LineWorld and OmniGlotCIG and SP: 26.3 -> 54.6 CIG, 28.4 -> 68.9 SP; 31.8 -> 61.7 CIG, 23.8 -> 64.8 SPHelped
add higher-order predicate optimization (ablation)TDL with clustering · LineWorld and OmniGlotSP: 68.9 -> 71.5; 64.8 -> 67.5Helped
add PPO tuning with heuristic reward (ablation)TDL with clustering · LineWorld and OmniGlotSP: 68.9 -> 82.6; 64.8 -> 77.4Helped
add attention layers (ablation)TDL with clustering · LineWorld and OmniGlotSP: 68.9 -> 70.8; 64.8 -> 66.8Helped
use latent diffusion (ablation)TDL with clustering · LineWorld and OmniGlotSP: 68.9 -> 66.9; 64.8 -> 62.8Hurt
remove pre-training (ablation)TDL · ShapeGlot transfer: Bed, Lamp, Sofa, TableIoU: 67.3 -> 18.1; 61.1 -> 18.3; 62.2 -> 21.5; 68.3 -> 19.9Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LineWorld OmniGlot ShapeNet5 ShapeGlot

Benchmarks: LineWorld OmniGlot ShapeNet5 LW-G OG-G ShapeGlot transfer

Metrics: IoU clustering information gain shape score MAE top-1 relation accuracy

Baselines: DFF SCOPS UPD AutoEncoder

Builds on: SMLD PPO Unigram Language Model ShapeGlot

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy