atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Neural Common Neighbor with Completion for Link Prediction

ICLR 2024 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Graph structure learning · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes NCN, an MPNN-then-SF link prediction architecture that pools MPNN node representations over common neighbors, and NCNC, which softly completes unobserved common-neighbor links with NCN before reapplying NCN.

Problem

Link prediction models that combine structural features with MPNNs trade off expressivity against scalability, and graph incompleteness (unobserved links in the input graph) reduces common neighbors and causes train/test distribution shifts that hurt performance.

Approach

MPNN-then-SF runs MPNN once on the original graph and uses structural features (common-neighbor sets) to guide pooling of node representations, giving SEAL-like expressivity at GAE-like cost; common neighbor completion (CNC) softly fills unobserved common-neighbor edges using NCN's predicted probabilities before a second NCN pass.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add common-neighbor completion to NCNNCN · CoraHR@100: 89.05{\scriptstyle \pm 0.96} -> 89.65{\scriptstyle \pm 1.36}Helped
add common-neighbor completion to NCNNCN · CiteseerHR@100: 91.56{\scriptstyle \pm 1.43} -> 93.47{\scriptstyle \pm 0.95}Helped
add common-neighbor completion to NCNNCN · PubmedHR@100: 79.05{\scriptstyle \pm 1.16} -> 81.29{\scriptstyle \pm 0.95}Helped
add common-neighbor completion to NCNNCN · CollabHR@50: 64.76{\scriptstyle \pm 0.87} -> 66.61{\scriptstyle \pm 0.71}Helped
add common-neighbor completion to NCNNCN · PPAHR@100: 61.19{\scriptstyle \pm 0.85} -> 61.42{\scriptstyle \pm 0.73}Helped
add common-neighbor completion to NCNNCN · Citation2MRR: 88.09{\scriptstyle \pm 0.06} -> 89.12{\scriptstyle \pm 0.40}Helped
add common-neighbor completion to NCNNCN · DDIHR@20: 82.32{\scriptstyle \pm 6.10} -> 84.11{\scriptstyle \pm 3.67}Helped
add common-neighbor pairwise features to GAE (ablation)GAE · OGB datasetslink prediction score: 70%Helped
use MPNN-then-SF NCN instead of MPNN-and-SF GAE+CN (ablation)GAE+CN · link prediction benchmarkslink prediction score: 5.5%Helped
add high-order neighborhood overlap (ablation)NCN · Cora, Citeseer, Pubmed, Collablink prediction score: 88.87{\scriptstyle \pm 1.34}; 91.36{\scriptstyle \pm 1.02}; 80.21{\scriptstyle \pm 0.78}; 65.43{\scriptstyle \pm 0.46}No clear effect
add neighborhood-difference representations (ablation)NCN · DDIHR@20: 82.32{\scriptstyle \pm 6.10} -> 17.67{\scriptstyle \pm 8.70}Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cora Citeseer Pubmed ogbl-collab ogbl-ppa ogbl-citation2 ogbl-ddi

Benchmarks: Cora Citeseer Pubmed ogbl-collab ogbl-ppa ogbl-citation2 ogbl-ddi

Metrics: Hits@K MRR inference time GPU memory

Baselines: CN RA AA GCN SAGE SEAL NBFNet Neo-GNN BUDDY GAE Node2Vec DeepWalk

Builds on: Graph Autoencoder SEAL Neo-GNN BUDDY PLNLP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy