atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

Lie Group Decompositions for Equivariant Neural Networks

ICLR 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › CNN design · approach: Group symmetry equivariant networks · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a framework for building equivariant convolutional networks over non-compact, non-abelian matrix Lie groups (GL+(n,R), SL(n,R), and affine groups R^n ⋊ G) via Haar-measure factorization and a Cartan/polar decomposition that avoids the limits of the group exponential.

Problem

Equivariant networks for non-compact, non-abelian Lie groups are hard because the group exponential is not surjective and Haar-measure sampling is difficult, so standard harmonic/exponential-map methods do not apply to affine groups.

Approach

Decompose GL+(n,R) and SL(n,R) via the polar/Cartan decomposition A = S^{1/2}R into an SPD (or unit-det SPD) factor and an SO(n) factor, so the Haar measure factorizes as a product of invariant measures that can be sampled independently; a global parametrization map Phi^{-1}(A) = (1/2 logm(AA^T), expm(-1/2 logm(AA^T))A) is used to build Lie-algebra kernels for affine-equivariant convolutions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use volume-preserving affine group R^2 ⋊ SL(2) instead of R^2 ⋊ GL+(2)affine-equivariant CNN · affNISTclassification accuracy (%): 98.5 vs 97.4Helped
Model with R^2 ⋊ SL(2) group equivariance outperforms prior equivariant models and Capsule Networksaffine-equivariant CNN · affNISTclassification accuracy (%): 98.5 vs 98.1 (best CapsNet)Helped
Monte Carlo sampling reduced to 10 samples instead of 100 used by affConvaffine-equivariant CNN · affNISTclassification accuracy (%): 98.5 vs 95.08 (affConv, 100 samples)Helped
Model with R^2 ⋊ SL(2) equivariance outperforms affConv on homography transformationsaffine-equivariant CNN · homNISTclassification accuracy (%): 98.3 vs 95.71Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MNIST affNIST homNIST

Benchmarks: affNIST homNIST

Metrics: classification accuracy

Baselines: affConv VB CapsNet RU CapsNet affine CapsNet Equivariant CapsNet

Builds on: group equivariant CNNs Lie group convolutional networks (affine convolution) Capsule Networks

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy