atlas

Research map / Image generation / Image restoration

Dual Associated Encoder for Face Restoration

ICLR 2024 · Image generation › Image restoration · approach: Real-world restoration with unaligned data · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DAEFR, a dual-branch codebook-prior face restoration framework that adds an LQ-trained auxiliary encoder, associates HQ and LQ encoder features via a CLIP-style cross-entropy patch-similarity loss, and fuses them with multi-head cross-attention before transformer code prediction.

Problem

Blind face restoration with codebook priors relies on a single HQ-pretrained encoder to encode LQ inputs, which introduces domain bias and imprecise feature representations under severe degradation.

Approach

Add an auxiliary LQ encoder and codebook trained on LQ data, align the HQ and LQ encoder features with a patch-level cross-entropy similarity (association) stage, and fuse them with MHCA to predict HQ code indices.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add an auxiliary LQ encoder alongside the HQ encoder (ablation)DAEFR · CelebA-TestNIQE: 4.297 vs 4.394Helped
Associate the HQ and LQ encoders (ablation)DAEFR with HQ and LQ encoders · CelebA-TestNIQE: 4.297 -> 4.290Helped
Replace linear projection with MHCA feature fusion (ablation)DAEFR with associated encoders · CelebA-TestLMD: 4.197 -> 4.019Helped
Increase LQ feature scale from 0 to 1.0 (ablation)DAEFR · CelebA-TestPSNR: 20.040 -> 21.488Helped
Use cross-entropy rather than L1 association loss (ablation)DAEFR association · CelebA validationFID: 70.717 -> 41.230Helped
Use cross-entropy rather than L2 association loss (ablation)DAEFR association · CelebA validationLPIPS: 0.552 -> 0.361Helped
Use cross-entropy instead of L1 or L2 feature matching (ablation)DAEFR association · CelebA validationLPIPS: L1 Loss 0.403; L2 Loss 0.552; Cross-Entropy Loss 0.361Mixed
Use DAEFR instead of CodeFormerFace restoration followed by ArcFace verification · LFW face recognition validation, severe degradationVerification performance (%): 71.67 -> 73.78Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: FFHQ CelebA-HQ LFW WIDER Face BRIAR

Benchmarks: CelebA-Test LFW-Test WIDER-Test BRIAR-Test LFW face recognition validation

Metrics: FID NIQE LPIPS PSNR SSIM IDA LMD verification accuracy

Baselines: PSFRGAN GFP-GAN GPEN RestoreFormer CodeFormer VQFR DR2

Builds on: VQGAN VQ-VAE CLIP CodeFormer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy