atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / MDPs and planning

Soft Robust MDPs and Risk-Sensitive MDPs: Equivalence, Policy Gradient, and Sample Complexity

ICLR 2024 · Reinforcement learning › MDPs and planning · approach: Robust MDP policy gradient · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces a new risk-sensitive MDP formulation shown equivalent to soft robust MDPs, derives policy gradient theorem with global convergence for tabular direct parameterization, and proposes offline RFZI for KL-soft RMDPs with sample complexity analysis.

Problem

Connecting risk-sensitive MDPs and robust MDPs, and developing policy gradient and sample-based offline learning with theoretical guarantees, since Markov risk measures are not gradient-dominant.

Approach

Defines a risk-sensitive value function where policy randomness is treated risk-neutrally and risk arises only from transition uncertainty; shows equivalence with soft RMDPs whose penalty is independent of the policy, enabling gradient domination and a Z-function fitted iteration for the KL/entropy case.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase penalty magnitude βExact policy gradient · 14-state cycle with fixed mild transition noise (α=0.01)risk-averse policy behaviorHelped
Increase transition noise αExact policy gradient · 14-state cycle with fixed moderate penalty magnituderisk-averse policy behaviorHelped
Use a risk-sensitive policy instead of the risk-neutral policyExact policy gradient · 14-state cycle, large perturbation magnitude δrobustness valueHelped
Use the learned risk-sensitive policy instead of the robust baseline policyExact policy gradient · 14-state cycle under transition perturbationsrobustness valueMixed
Increase penalty magnitude βExact policy gradient · 14-state cycle across perturbation magnitudes δrobustness valueMixed
Increase penalty magnitude βRFZI · 100-state environment under model uncertaintyrobustness valueHelped
Increase penalty magnitude βPractical RFZI · 100-state environmenttraining stabilityHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic cycle-graph MDP (14-state and 100-state environments)

Benchmarks: cycle-graph hitting reward MDP (14-state, 100-state)

Metrics: optimality gap average test reward robustness value

Baselines: risk-neutral optimal policy robust baseline policy (KL-rectangular RMDP) RFQI

Builds on: Markov risk measures robust MDP sup-inf formulation RFQI fitted Q iteration

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy