atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Differential privacy

Differentially Private Synthetic Data via Foundation Model APIs 1: Images

ICLR 2024 · Federated learning and privacy › Differential privacy · approach: Differentially private synthetic data · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Private Evolution (PE), which generates DP synthetic images using only blackbox inference APIs (random generation and variation) of pretrained diffusion models, guided by DP nearest-neighbor histogram voting from private samples, without any model training.

Problem

Generating differentially private synthetic images is typically done by training or fine-tuning generative models with DP-SGD, which is hard to deploy and inapplicable when foundation models are API-only; the paper asks whether DP synthetic data can be generated using only blackbox inference APIs wh

Approach

Treat pretrained models as blackboxes accessed via random-generation and sample-variation APIs; iteratively use noisy nearest-neighbor votes from private samples in an embedding space to select generated samples and evolve them, with DP Gaussian noise and thresholding, so the whole evolutionary loop is DP without any gradient or training.</ättribute>

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use Private Evolution instead of DP-DiffusionDP synthetic image generation on CIFAR10 · CIFAR10privacy cost at FID ≤7.9: 32 -> 0.67Helped
Use Private Evolution instead of prior SOTADP synthetic data for downstream classification · CIFAR10 testaccuracy: +6.1%Helped
Use Private Evolution instead of prior SOTADP synthetic data for downstream classification · Camelyon17 testaccuracy: 80.33% vs 91.1%Hurt
Generate more samples by repeatedly applying the variation APIPrivate Evolution · CIFAR10 testaccuracy: 89.13%Helped
Use the 270M pre-trained network instead of the 100M network (ablation)Private Evolution · CIFAR10 and Camelyon17resultsHelped
Use a 100M pre-trained network instead of the 270M network (ablation)Private Evolution · CIFAR10 and Camelyon17convergence speedHurt
Use CLIP embeddings instead of ImageNet inception embeddings (ablation)Private Evolution · CIFAR10resultsNo clear effect
Vary lookahead degree, number of generated samples, threshold, and embedding network (ablation)Private Evolution · CIFAR10 and Camelyon17resultsNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR10 ImageNet Camelyon17 Cat Cookie and Cat Doudou (author's cat photos, 100 512x512 each)

Benchmarks: CIFAR10 Camelyon17

Metrics: FID downstream classification accuracy privacy epsilon

Baselines: DP-Diffusion DP-MEPF DP-GAN

Builds on: Improved Diffusion DP-SGD DP-Diffusion Stable Diffusion evolutionary algorithms

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy