atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

OWL: A Large Language Model for IT Operations

ICLR 2024 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: LLM unlearning and benchmarks · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces Owl, a LLaMA2-13B-based LLM for IT operations, trained on the Owl-Instruct dataset and evaluated on the new Owl-Bench, with a training-free long-context method (HMCE) and a mixture-of-adapter LoRA tuning strategy.

Problem

General-purpose LLMs lack specialized knowledge for IT operations and maintenance (O&M), and existing context-length and tuning methods and benchmarks do not address this domain.

Approach

Builds a domain instruction dataset via expert seeds plus GPT-4-assisted self-instruct augmentation, extends NBCE to a homogeneous Markov chain formulation (HMCE) for training-free long-context inference, and uses a top-k mixture of LoRA adapters gated by language representations for multi-domain tuning.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
apply HMCE context extensionOwl-13b · Owl-Bench long-context inference, sequence length 8192perplexity: 314.49 -> 6.10Helped
replace NBCE with HMCE context extensionOwl-13b · Owl-Bench long-context inference, sequence length 8192perplexity: 8.24 -> 6.10Helped
add Mixture-of-Adapter (ablation)Owl · Owl-Bench multiple-choice, zero-shotmean accuracy: 0.73 -> 0.76Helped
replace Mixture-of-Adapter with LoRA fine-tuning (ablation)Owl · Owl-Bench multiple-choice, zero-shotmean accuracy: 0.76 -> 0.71Hurt
use Owl instead of LogPrompt (ChatGPT)zero-shot log anomaly detection · BGLF1-score: 0.384 -> 0.446Helped
use Owl instead of LogPrompt (ChatGPT)zero-shot log anomaly detection · SpiritF1-score: 0.450 -> 0.518Helped
use Owl instead of LogPrompt (ChatGPT)zero-shot log parsing · LogHub averageRandIndex: 0.865 -> 0.886Mixed
use Owl instead of LogPrompt (ChatGPT)zero-shot log parsing · LogHub averagefine-level F1-score: 0.881 -> 0.894Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Owl-Instruct LogHub

Benchmarks: Owl-Bench LogHub

Metrics: average score (1-10) pairwise win/tie/loss accuracy perplexity F1-score precision recall RandIndex

Baselines: ChatGPT LLaMA2-13b ChatGLM2-6b ChatGLM-6b Qwen-7b InternLM-7b DeepLog LogAnomaly LogRobust LogPrompt LogPPT

Builds on: Self-Instruct NBCE LoRA Baize LLaMA2

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy