atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Dynamical systems

BrainLM: A foundation model for brain activity recordings

ICLR 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Dynamical systems · approach: Functional connectivity modeling · 45 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces BrainLM, a Transformer masked autoencoder pretrained on about 6,700 hours of fMRI from UK Biobank and HCP for reconstruction, fine-tuning, and zero-shot analyses of brain activity.

Problem

Existing fMRI analysis methods are narrow, task-specific, and trained on small datasets, so they fail to learn generalizable representations of spatiotemporal brain activity.

Approach

Pretrain a masked-autoencoder Transformer on a very large corpus of parcel-wise fMRI time series using spatiotemporal masking, then reuse the encoder for clinical regression, future-state forecasting, attention-based network discovery, and gradient-based in silico perturbation without task-specific training.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Fine-tune the pretrained BrainLM modelBrainLM · UKB age predictionMSE: 0.857 ± 0.1135 -> 0.485 ± 0.0252Helped
Fine-tune the pretrained BrainLM modelBrainLM · UKB PTSD prediction (PCL)MSE: 0.022 ± 0.0019 -> 0.018 ± 0.0008Helped
Fine-tune the pretrained BrainLM modelBrainLM · UKB anxiety prediction (GAD7)MSE: 0.094 ± 0.0079 -> 0.074 ± 0.0053Helped
Fine-tune the pretrained BrainLM modelBrainLM · UKB neuroticism predictionMSE: 0.086 ± 0.0047 -> 0.072 ± 0.0049Helped
Add pretraining (ablation)BrainLM · UKB future-state forecastingMSE: 0.695 -> 0.648Helped
Add pretraining (ablation)BrainLM · HCP future-state forecastingMSE: 0.583 -> 0.568Helped
Use 100% rather than 1% of training data (ablation)BrainLM with 75% masking · UKB masked reconstruction (MR=0.2)R2: 0.361 -> 0.402Helped
Use 100% rather than 1% of training data (ablation)BrainLM with 75% masking · HCP masked reconstruction (MR=0.2)R2: 0.300 -> 0.316Helped
Use 75% rather than 90% masking (ablation)BrainLM trained on 100% data · UKB masked reconstruction (MR=0.2)R2: 0.221 -> 0.402Helped
Use 75% rather than 90% masking (ablation)BrainLM trained on 100% data · HCP masked reconstruction (MR=0.2)R2: 0.176 -> 0.316Helped
Use BrainLM self-attention weights instead of raw parcel time seriesFunctional network identification · UKB functional network identificationaccuracy: 39.2 -> 58.8Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: UK Biobank Human Connectome Project

Benchmarks: UK Biobank held-out test set Human Connectome Project

Metrics: R2 MSE Pearson correlation accuracy

Baselines: SVM on raw data SVM on pretrained embeddings LSTM Neural ODE Latent ODE Variational Autoencoder Graph Convolutional Network k-NN on raw data

Builds on: masked autoencoder BERT Vision Transformer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy