atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Black-box and transfer attacks

BRUSLEATTACK: A QUERY-EFFICIENT SCORE- BASED BLACK-BOX SPARSE ADVERSARIAL ATTACK

ICLR 2024 · Adversarial robustness and security › Black-box and transfer attacks · approach: Query-efficient black-box attacks · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes BrusLeAttack, a Bayesian score-based black-box sparse (l0) adversarial attack that reformulates pixel selection over a binary mask with Dirichlet-categorical updates, outperforming Sparse-RS in query efficiency on CIFAR-10, STL-10 and ImageNet.

Problem

Generating minimum-pixel (l0-bounded) adversarial perturbations against image classifiers using only confidence-score outputs under a limited query budget; the problem is NP-hard and has a mixed discrete/continuous non-differentiable search space.

Approach

Reduce the search over pixel positions and colors to a binary mask over pixels with a synthetic random color image, then sample masks from a Dirichlet-conjugate categorical model whose posterior is updated from historical pixel manipulations that increase loss, plus a pixel-dissimilarity map to bias unselected-pixel sampling.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Bayesian pixel-selection search (BrusLeAttack) instead of Sparse-RS random searchsparse attack on ImageNet ResNet-50, ViT, ResNet-50 (SIN) · ImageNet targeted, 0.4-1.0% sparsity, up to 10K queriesASR: e.g. +3.4 points at 1.0% sparsity, 10K queries on ResNet-50Helped
Bayesian pixel-selection search (BrusLeAttack) instead of Sparse-RSuntargeted sparse attack on ImageNet · ImageNet untargeted, 0.04% to 0.2% sparsityASRMixed
Bayesian search (BrusLeAttack) instead of Sparse-RS on defended modelsadversarially trained and RND-defended ImageNet models · ImageNet, 5K queries, 0.04-0.2% sparsityaccuracy under attack (lower is stronger): e.g. RND at 0.2%: 42.6% vs 56.8% for Sparse-RSHelped
Replace starting image from target class with random synthetic color image as initialization (ablation)BrusLeAttack · CIFAR-10 targeted, 1.0% sparsityASR: 68.21% vs 62.68%Helped
Replace starting image with synthetic color image at 2.0% sparsity (ablation)BrusLeAttack · CIFAR-10 targeted, 2.0% sparsityASR: 90.24% vs 87.17%Helped
Adapt SparseEvo with alternative score-based loss fitness instead of BrusLeAttack (ablation)SparseEvo (score-based adaptation) · CIFAR-10 targeted, 1.0% to 3.9% sparsity, 500 queriesASR: e.g. 68.75% vs 90.24% at 2.0% sparsityHurt
Use decision-based SparseEvo baseline instead of BrusLeAttack (score-based)SparseEvo · CIFAR-10 targeted, 500 queries vs SparseEvo 2K queriesASRHurt
Replace Sparse-RS with BrusLeAttack for score-based sparse attackGoogle Cloud Vision demo · GCV targeted, 5K queries, 0.5% sparsityattack success on example images: Sparse-RS fails on four images; BrusLeAttack succeeds on allHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 STL-10 ImageNet

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 STL-10 ImageNet

Metrics: attack success rate query efficiency robust accuracy under attack

Baselines: Sparse-RS SparseEvo Pointwise PGD_0

Builds on: Sparse-RS SparseEvo Pointwise PGD_0

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy