atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Knowledge distillation

Less or More From Teacher: Exploiting Trilateral Geometry For Knowledge Distillation

ICLR 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Knowledge distillation · approach: Rethinking distillation objectives · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes TGeo-KD, which learns a sample-wise knowledge fusion ratio between distillation and ground-truth losses from intra- and inter-sample trilateral geometry of student, teacher, and ground-truth predictions, via a bilevel formulation.

Problem

Knowledge distillation requires balancing soft teacher supervision and hard ground-truth supervision, but existing methods use constant, annealed, or heuristic sample-independent fusion ratios that are suboptimal.

Approach

Model the student, teacher, and ground-truth predictions as a triangle per sample (edges and vertices), add the class-average teacher prediction as an inter-sample vertex, and let a small MLP map these geometric features to a sample-wise fusion ratio learned in a bilevel optimization.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use TGeo-KD instead of ADA-KDResNet-56→ResNet-20 distillation · CIFAR-100Top-1 accuracy (%): 72.22 ±0.21 -> 72.98 ±0.14Helped
Use TGeo-KD instead of WLS-KDResNet-110→ResNet-32 distillation · CIFAR-100Top-1 accuracy (%): 74.12 -> 75.09 ±0.13Helped
Use TGeo-KD instead of WLS-KDResNet-32×4→ShuffleNetV1 distillation · CIFAR-100Top-1 accuracy (%): 75.46 -> 76.83 ±0.17Helped
Use TGeo-KD instead of WLS-KDResNet-34→ResNet-18 distillation · ImageNetTop-1 accuracy: 72.04 -> 72.89 ±0.15Helped
Use TGeo-KD instead of WLS-KDResNet-34→ResNet-18 distillation · ImageNetTop-5 accuracy: 90.70 -> 91.80 ±0.04Helped
Use TGeo-KD instead of WLS-KDResNet-50→MobileNetV1 distillation · ImageNetTop-1 accuracy: 71.52 -> 72.46 ±0.14Helped
Use TGeo-KD instead of ADA-KD12-layer BERT→4-layer BERT distillation · HILACC (%): 90.15 -> 92.39Helped
Use TGeo-KD instead of WLS-KD12-layer BERT→4-layer BERT distillation · CriteoACC (%): 75.30 -> 77.80Helped
Add the intra-sample STG relation (ablation)TGeo-KD on ResNet-32×4→ShuffleNetV1 · CIFAR-100Top-1 accuracy (%): 73.92 -> 75.28Helped
Add the inter-sample relation to intra-sample STG (ablation)TGeo-KD on ResNet-32×4→ShuffleNetV1 · CIFAR-100Top-1 accuracy (%): 75.28 -> 76.83Helped
Use a 2-layer rather than a 1-layer MLP for the fusion-ratio generator (ablation)TGeo-KD with ResNet-110→ResNet-32 · CIFAR-100Top-1 accuracy (%): 72.69 -> 74.31Helped
Use combined vertex-and-edge representation R3 rather than R1 or R2 (ablation)TGeo-KD · CIFAR-100Top-1 accuracy (%): 70.32; 68.44 -> 72.98Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-100 ImageNet HIL Criteo DomainNet

Benchmarks: CIFAR-100 ImageNet HIL Criteo DomainNet

Metrics: top-1 accuracy top-5 accuracy ACC AUC NLL

Baselines: Vanilla KD ANL-KD ADA-KD WLS-KD RW-KD FitNet AT SP CC VID RKD PKT

Builds on: knowledge distillation WLS-KD RW-KD ADA-KD ANL-KD

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy