atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Neural Atoms: Propagating Long-range Interaction in Molecular Graphs through Efficient Communication Channel

ICLR 2024 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Physics-inspired GNNs · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Neural Atoms, a plug-in attention module that projects atoms into a few learnable super-nodes, exchanges information among them, and projects back, so GNNs can capture long-range interactions in molecular graphs.

Problem

GNNs capture short-range interactions well but struggle with long-range interactions (LRI) in molecular graphs, due to over-squashing and over-smoothing as multi-hop information must pass through many intermediate atoms.

Approach

Learnable attention-based grouping projects all atoms into a small set of neural atoms, which communicate via self-attention so any distant atom pair interacts in a single hop; results are projected back to enhance atom features. The paper links this to Ewald summation's long-range term.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add Neural AtomsGatedGCN · Peptides-func testAP: 0.5864 $\pm$ 0.0077 -> 0.6562 $\pm$ 0.0075Helped
add Neural AtomsGINE · Peptides-struct testMAE: 0.3547 $\pm$ 0.0045 -> 0.2553 $\pm$ 0.0005Helped
add Neural AtomsGatedGCN+RWSE · Peptides-struct testMAE: 0.3357 $\pm$ 0.0006 -> 0.2568 $\pm$ 0.0005Helped
add Neural AtomsGatedGCN+RWSE · PCQM-Contact testMRR: 0.3242 $\pm$ 0.0008 -> 0.3262 $\pm$ 0.0010Helped
add Neural AtomsSchNet · OE62 validationEnergy MAE: 0.1351 -> 0.0834Helped
add Neural AtomsPaiNN · OE62 validationEnergy MAE: 0.6049 -> 0.0558Helped
add Neural AtomsPaiNN · OE62 validationEnergy MSE: 0.0133 -> 0.0122Helped
add Neural AtomsDimeNet++ · OE62 validationEnergy MAE: 0.0501 -> 0.0551Hurt
use incremental rather than fixed grouping (ablation)GCN + Neural Atoms · Peptides-struct testMAE: 0.2582 $\pm$ 0.0011 -> 0.3239 $\pm$ 0.0014Hurt
use decremental rather than fixed grouping (ablation)GCN + Neural Atoms · Peptides-struct testMAE: 0.2582 $\pm$ 0.0011 -> 0.2606$\pm$ 0.0003No clear effect
set neural-atom proportion to 0.9 rather than 0.1 (ablation)GCN + Neural Atoms · Peptides-func testAP: 0.5859 $\pm$ 0.0073 -> 0.6220 $\pm$ 0.0046Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Peptides-func Peptides-struct PCQM-Contact OE62 Mutagenicity ogbn-arXiv Amazon Product-Computer

Benchmarks: Peptides-func Peptides-struct PCQM-Contact OE62

Metrics: AP MAE MRR energy MAE energy MSE

Baselines: GCN GINE GCNII GatedGCN GatedGCN+RWSE Transformer+LapPE SAN+LapPE GraphGPS SchNet PaiNN DimeNet++ Ewald Block

Builds on: GraphGPS Ewald-based message passing virtual node graph transformer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy