atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

LLM-CXR: Instruction-Finetuned LLM for CXR Image Understanding and Generation

ICLR 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Multimodal LLMs · approach: Visual instruction tuning · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Instruction-tunes a text-only LLM (dolly-v2-3b) on MIMIC-CXR with VQ-GAN image tokens expanded into its vocabulary, enabling CXR report generation, CXR image generation, and CXR VQA in one model.

Problem

Adapter-based multimodal LLMs leave a bottleneck between image and text representations, limiting vision-language alignment for medical images such as chest X-rays, which need fine-grained visual detail for both understanding and generation.

Approach

Treat VQ-GAN image tokens as added vocabulary of a pretrained instruction-tuned LLM and fine-tune it on bidirectional CXR tasks (report-to-CXR, CXR-to-report, CXR-VQA, NL instruction following) with a conditional response-only loss, plus a clinical feature-preserving L2 loss in the VQ-GAN and LLM-generated synthetic VQA data.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add clinical information-preserving loss (ablation)LLM-CXR · CXR-to-reportAUROC weighted: 0.5853 -> 0.5969Helped
add simultaneous CXR-VQA training (ablation)LLM-CXR · CXR-to-reportAUROC weighted: 0.5846 -> 0.5969Helped
include stage 1 training on the full dataset (ablation)LLM-CXR · CXR-to-reportAUROC weighted: 0.5435 -> 0.5969Helped
use instruction-tuning loss instead of joint loss (ablation)LLM-CXR · CXR-to-reportAUROC weighted: 0.5745 -> 0.5969Helped
add clinical information-preserving loss (ablation)LLM-CXR · Report-to-CXRAUROC weighted: 0.8223 -> 0.8054Hurt
add clinical information-preserving loss (ablation)LLM-CXR · Report-to-CXRF1 weighted: 0.7977 -> 0.7991Helped
add simultaneous CXR-VQA training (ablation)LLM-CXR · Report-to-CXRAUROC weighted: 0.7465 -> 0.8054Helped
include stage 1 training on the full dataset (ablation)LLM-CXR · Report-to-CXRAUROC weighted: 0.7167 -> 0.8054Helped
use instruction-tuning loss instead of joint loss (ablation)LLM-CXR · Report-to-CXRAUROC weighted: 0.5808 -> 0.8054Helped
add clinical information-preserving loss (ablation)LLM-CXR · Report-to-CXRFID txv-all-1024: 0.931 -> 0.714Helped
add simultaneous CXR-VQA training (ablation)LLM-CXR · Report-to-CXRFID txv-all-1024: 1.539 -> 0.714Helped
include stage 1 training on the full dataset (ablation)LLM-CXR · Report-to-CXRFID txv-all-1024: 1.226 -> 0.714Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MIMIC-CXR-JPG Indiana University chest X-ray dataset synthetic CXR VQA (Llama2-generated)

Benchmarks: MIMIC-CXR-JPG ELIXR VQA question set

Metrics: AUROC F1 Jaccard similarity index BLEU METEOR ROUGE-L CIDEr FID VQA accuracy

Baselines: UniXGen XrayGPT RadFM IFCC R2Gen ELIXR RoentGen

Builds on: VQ-GAN Alpaca instruction tuning Dolly-v2 TorchXRayVision

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy