atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks Learned by Transduction

ICLR 2022 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Attack evaluation and defense critique · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Evaluate RMC with GMSA-AVG rather than the defense-unaware AutoAttackRMC with a standard base model · MNISTrobustness: 97.70% to 0.50%Hurt
Evaluate RMC with GMSA-AVG rather than the defense-unaware AutoAttackRMC with a standard base model · CIFAR-10robustness: 94.20% to 8.00%Hurt
Apply RMC on an adversarially trained model instead of using adversarial training aloneRMC · MNIST and CIFAR-10robustness: 96.10% to 58.80%; 71.70% to 39.60%Hurt
Use GMSA to evaluate DANN instead of AutoAttackDANN · MNIST and CIFAR-10robustness: 97.59 to 6.17; 66.61 to 5.53Hurt
Adversarially retrain at test time using fresh private randomnessTADV · MNISTrobustness: 86.61% to 94.27%Helped
Adversarially retrain at test time using fresh private randomnessTADV · CIFAR-10robustness: 45.29% to 54.12%Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy