atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

Unrestricted Adversarial Examples via Semantic Manipulation

ICLR 2020 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: Adversarial perturbations beyond images · 68 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use semantic colorization perturbations instead of small norm-bounded perturbationsImageNet classifiers · ImageNet, white-box target attacktarget attack success rate: 99.78Helped
transfer colorization perturbations across modelsColor attack (k=4) · ImageNet transfer to VGG19target attack success rate: 31.00Mixed
add texture transfer from a target-class imageTexture attack · ImageNet, JPEG75misclassification rate: 32.89Helped
increase texture-transfer iterations from one to three (ablation)Texture attack (α=250) · ImageNet, JPEG75misclassification rate: 32.89 -> 36.33Helped
increase texture-transfer iterations from one to three (ablation)Texture attack (α=250) · ImageNet, adversarially trained ResNet152misclassification rate: 2.10 -> 4.6Helped
remove the adversarial cross-entropy loss (ablation)Texture attack (α=250) · ImageNet, white-box target attacktarget attack success rate: 25.00Hurt
use a random texture source rather than a nearest target-class source (ablation)Texture attack · ImageNet, white-box target attacktarget attack success rate: 99.67; 97.99No clear effect
use a nearest target-class texture source rather than a random source (ablation)Texture attack · ImageNet, visual realismphotorealismHelped
increase color hints from 25 to 50 (ablation)Color attack (k=4) · ImageNet, white-box target attacktarget attack success rate: 99.78; 99.78No clear effect
increase color hints from 50 to 100 (ablation)Color attack (k=4) · ImageNet, white-box target attacktarget attack success rate: 99.78 -> 99.44Hurt
increase the number of color clusters represented by hints (ablation)Color attack · ImageNet, defense robustnessmisclassification rate: 52.33; 46.61; 42.61; 38.22Hurt
increase texture weight α (ablation)Texture attack · ImageNet, defense robustnessmisclassification rate: 32.89; 31.49Mixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy