Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels
Discrepancy Ratio: Evaluating Model Performance When Even Experts Disagree on the Truth
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Closest papers by meaning
- TrainRef: Curating Data with Label Distribution and Minimal Reference for Accurate Prediction and Reliable Confidence (ICLR 2026 · similarity 0.87)
- Limits to scalable evaluation at the frontier: LLM as judge won’t beat twice the data (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.85)
- Doomed to Re-Annotate, Forever: The ImageNet Story (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.85)
- Quantifying Uncertainty in Error Consistency: Towards Reliable Behavioral Comparison of Classifiers (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.85)
- Evaluating Model Bias Requires Characterizing its Mistakes (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.84)
- Crossing the Validation crisis: Cross-validation reduces benchmarking variance surprisingly well (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.84)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.