AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Selfless Sequential Learning

ICLR 2019 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Hebbian and predictive coding · 75 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add SLNID with randomly initialized fully connected layersMAS on the 8-task object recognition sequence · 8-task object recognition sequenceaverage test accuracy: 52.69 -> 54.50Helped
Add SLNID with pretrained fully connected layersMAS on the 8-task object recognition sequence · 8-task object recognition sequenceaverage test accuracy: 52.69 -> 53.77Helped
Add representation sparsity regularizationMAS on Permuted MNIST · Permuted MNIST, hidden size 128average test accuracy: 92.67 -> 95.83Helped
Add full SLNID, including locality and neuron importanceMAS on CIFAR-100 · CIFAR-100, 10 tasks, hidden size 256average test accuracy: 55.06 -> 63.30Helped
Add neuron importance integration to neural inhibition (ablation)SNI on CIFAR-100 · CIFAR-100, 10 tasks, hidden size 256average test accuracy: 55.30 -> 63.30Helped
Add locality relaxation to neural inhibition with neuron importance (ablation)SNID on CIFAR-100 · CIFAR-100, 10 tasks, hidden size 256average test accuracy: 61.00 -> 63.30Helped
Add neuron importance integration (ablation)SLNI on Permuted MNIST · Permuted MNIST, hidden size 128average test accuracy: 95.95 -> 95.83Hurt
Add locality relaxation (ablation)SNID on Permuted MNIST · Permuted MNIST, hidden size 128average test accuracy: 95.90 -> 95.83No clear effect
Add MAS importance-weight regularization to SLNID (ablation)SLNID on CIFAR-100 without hard task boundaries · CIFAR-100 without hard task boundaries, final average accuracyaverage accuracy: 70.75% -> 70.94%Helped
Add neuron importance integration to local inhibition (ablation)SLNI w/o MAS on CIFAR-100 without hard task boundaries · CIFAR-100 without hard task boundaries, final average accuracyaverage accuracy: 63.54% -> 70.75%Helped
Add locality relaxation to neural inhibition (ablation)SNI on Permuted MNIST · Permuted MNIST, hidden size 64average test accuracy: 94.89 -> 93.89No clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy