atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Pruning and efficient tuning

Soft Weight-Sharing for Neural Network Compression

ICLR 2017 · Architectures and efficiency › Pruning and efficient tuning · approach: Joint pruning and quantization · 79 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
soft weight-sharing with learned mixture prior instead of Han et al. prune-quantize pipelineLeNet-300-100 · MNISTcompression rate: 40 -> 64Helped
soft weight-sharing instead of Han et al.LeNet-5-Caffe · MNISTcompression rate: 39 -> 162Helped
soft weight-sharing instead of Han et al.LeNet-300-100 · MNISTtop-1 error after compression (%): 1.58 -> 1.94Hurt
soft weight-sharing instead of Han et al.LeNet-5-Caffe · MNISTtop-1 error after compression (%): 0.74 -> 0.97Hurt
apply compression to light ResNetWRN-16-4 · CIFAR-10top-1 error (%): 6.48 -> 8.50Hurt
retrain without hyper-priors (mixtures collapse) (ablation)LeNet-300-100 · MNISTaccuracy: 0.9811 -> 0.9806No clear effect
Bayesian-optimize 13 hyper-parameters incl. hyper-priors with 40 epochs (ablation)LeNet-5-Caffe · MNISTcompression vs accuracy lossHelped
alternative initialization distributing means by equal probability mass (ablation)soft weight-sharing · MNISTcompressionNo clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy