atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Depth and stereo

Zero-Shot Monocular Scene Flow Estimation in the Wild

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › Depth and stereo · approach: Learned optical and scene flow · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a feedforward monocular scene flow model that jointly predicts two pointmaps and 3D camera-space offsets, initialized from MASt3R and trained on a ~1M-sample multi-dataset recipe with scale-adaptive loss, showing zero-shot generalization.

Problem

Monocular scene flow estimation from two RGB frames generalizes poorly to out-of-domain data because geometry and motion are entangled, scene flow data is scarce, datasets mix metric and relative scales, and parameterization choice matters.

Approach

Extend pointmap models (DUSt3R/MASt3R) with a third DPT head that predicts 3D motion offsets jointly with geometry, train on a large mixed-scale dataset recipe with an Xor-style scale normalization, and parameterize scene flow as camera-space 3D offsets.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use camera-space 3D offsets instead of end-point parameterization (ablation)Monocular scene flow model · KITTIEPE: 0.618 -> 0.452Helped
Use camera-space 3D offsets instead of depth change plus optical flow (ablation)Monocular scene flow model · KITTIEPE: 11.905 -> 0.452Helped
Add projected optical flow loss (ablation)CSO model with Xor scale handling · KITTIEPE: 0.501 -> 0.452Helped
Add projected optical flow loss (ablation)CSO model with Xor scale handling · KITTIδ1-m: 0.319 -> 0.345Helped
Use Xor scale handling instead of Align (ablation)CSO model · KITTIEPE: 1.596 -> 0.452Helped
Use Xor scale handling instead of Always normalization (ablation)CSO model · KITTIEPE: 0.899 -> 0.452Helped
Use Xor scale handling instead of Never normalization (ablation)CSO model · KITTIEPE: 0.758 -> 0.452Helped
Train jointly for geometry and motionMonocular scene flow model · Dynamic scenesdepth estimationHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SHIFT Dynamic Replica Virtual KITTI 2 MOVi-F PointOdyssey Spring KITTI Scene Flow

Benchmarks: KITTI Scene Flow Virtual KITTI 2 Spring DAVIS (qualitative) RoboTAP (qualitative)

Metrics: EPE AccS AccR Outliers AbsRel delta1

Baselines: Self-Mono-SF OpticalExpansion DUSt3R MASt3R MonST3R DepthAnythingV2 + RAFT SpaTracker

Builds on: DUSt3R MASt3R CroCo v2 MiDaS scale-invariant loss Self-Mono-SF

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy