atlas

Research map / Video / Video-language understanding

VideoGEM: Training-free Action Grounding in Videos

CVPR 2025 · Video › Video-language understanding · approach: Temporal video grounding · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes VideoGEM, a training-free method that adapts GEM's self-self attention to video-language models and adds static/dynamic layer weighting and verb/object/action prompt decomposition for spatial action grounding in videos.

Problem

Spatially localizing actions in videos with vision-language models without bounding-box training; actions lack clear physical outlines and are described by high-level concepts, and existing video grounding methods require training.

Approach

Extends the training-free GEM self-self attention to video backbones, weights higher transformer layers via a mix of static and prompt-dependent dynamic weights, and decomposes action prompts into verb, object, and action prompts whose predicted centers are averaged.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add VideoGEM's layer weighting and prompt decomposition to GEMCLIP · V-HICOaccuracy: 67.79 -> 76.90Helped
Add VideoGEM's layer weighting and prompt decomposition to GEMOpenCLIP · YouCook-Interactionsaccuracy: 56.87 -> 60.05Helped
Add VideoGEM's layer weighting and prompt decomposition to GEMViCLIP · GroundingYouTubeaccuracy: 51.28 -> 57.21Helped
Add static layer weights (ablation)VideoGEM with ViCLIP · V-HICOaccuracy: 74.79 -> 76.18Helped
Add dynamic layer weights (ablation)VideoGEM with OpenCLIP · GroundingYouTubeaccuracy: 40.17 -> 43.29Helped
Use combined static and dynamic layer weights (ablation)VideoGEM with OpenCLIP · GroundingYouTubeaccuracy: 40.17 -> 45.33Helped
Use prompt decomposition instead of only an action prompt (ablation)VideoGEM with ViCLIP · GroundingYouTubeaccuracy: 51.99 -> 57.21Helped
Use prompt decomposition instead of only an action prompt (ablation)VideoGEM with OpenCLIP · YouCook-Interactionsaccuracy: 57.36 -> 60.05Helped
Combine prompt predictions by weighted averaging predicted positions rather than averaging heatmaps (ablation)VideoGEM with ViCLIP · GroundingYouTubeaccuracy: 49.96 -> 57.21Helped
Use video frames rather than a repeated image (ablation)VideoGEM with ViCLIP · GroundingYouTubeaccuracy: 55.08 -> 57.21Helped
Use video frames rather than a repeated image (ablation)VideoGEM with ViCLIP · DALYaccuracy: 78.47 -> 78.25No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: V-HICO DALY YouCook-Interactions GroundingYouTube

Benchmarks: V-HICO DALY YouCook-Interactions GroundingYouTube

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: TubeDETR STCAT VideoGrounding-DINO GLIP CoMMA RegionCLIP WWW-CLIP GEM

Builds on: GEM CLIPSurgery MaskCLIP ViCLIP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy