atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Registration and matching

Unlocking Generalization Power in LiDAR Point Cloud Registration

CVPR 2025 · Point clouds › Registration and matching · approach: Learned feature-based registration · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes UGP, a LiDAR point cloud registration framework that removes inter-frame cross-attention, adds progressive self-attention and BEV image features, to improve cross-distance and cross-dataset generalization.

Problem

LiDAR point cloud registration generalizes poorly across distances (cross-distance) and across datasets (e.g., 64-line KITTI vs 32-line nuScenes), as cross-attention-based coarse-to-fine methods degrade under density shifts.

Approach

Eliminate inter-frame cross-attention so superpoint matching relies on intra-frame self-attention; add a distance-masked progressive self-attention that expands the attention range across layers, and fuse BEV image features into superpoint features.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
eliminate cross-attention (ablation)CoFiNet, GeoTrans, and PARE · KITTI cross-distance generalizationmRR: 49.7 -> 58.8; 28.2 -> 87.7; 25.4 -> 47.3Mixed
eliminate cross-attention (ablation)UGP · KITTI@40mRR: 2.2 -> 66.2Helped
add progressive self-attention (ablation)UGP with cross-attention elimination · KITTI@40mRR: 66.2 -> 71.2Helped
add progressive self-attention (ablation)UGP with cross-attention elimination · KITTI@30mRR: 95.1 -> 96.2Helped
add BEV fusion (ablation)UGP with cross-attention elimination · KITTI@40mRR: 66.2 -> 74.8Helped
add BEV fusion (ablation)UGP with cross-attention elimination · KITTI@30mRR: 95.1 -> 95.7Helped
use progressive self-attention and BEV fusion together (ablation)UGP with cross-attention elimination · KITTI@40mRR: 66.2 -> 82.0Helped
replace LGR with RANSAC50K (ablation)UGP · KITTI cross-distancemRR: 94.5 -> 92.4Hurt
replace LGR with MAC (ablation)UGP · KITTI cross-distancemRR: 94.5 -> 94.9Helped
use UGP instead of BUFFERLiDAR point cloud registration · KITTI@40m, trained on KITTI@10mRR: 61.2 -> 82.0Helped
use UGP instead of BUFFERLiDAR point cloud registration · nuScenes@40m, trained on nuScenes@10mRR: 15.2 -> 72.3Helped
use UGP instead of BUFFERLiDAR point cloud registration · KITTI@40m, trained on nuScenes@10mRR: 53.2 -> 74.1Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: KITTI nuScenes

Benchmarks: KITTI nuScenes

Metrics: Registration Recall (RR) mean Registration Recall (mRR) RRE RTE Patch Inlier Ratio Inlier Ratio

Baselines: FCGF SpinNet Predator CoFiNet GeoTransformer BUFFER PARE GCL

Builds on: GeoTransformer KPConv ResNet LGR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy