atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Segmentation and detection

Towards Explicit Geometry-Reflectance Collaboration for Generalized LiDAR Segmentation in Adverse Weather

CVPR 2025 · Point clouds › Segmentation and detection · approach: LiDAR segmentation for driving · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes GRC/GRCNet, a dual-branch LiDAR segmentation network that separately encodes geometry (voxel sparse conv) and reflectance (range-view 2D conv) and fuses them via variational-style information constraint and local/global fusion, for domain generalization to adverse weather without augmentation or simulation.

Problem

Generalized LiDAR semantic segmentation degrades under adverse weather, and prior work largely ignores that weather causes heterogeneous domain shifts in point-cloud geometry versus reflectance intensity.

Approach

Explicitly separate geometry and reflectance feature encoding into two branches (voxel 3D sparse conv and range-view 2D conv), then fuse them with a Complementarity-aware Information Constraint (variational KL-based) and a robust multi-level fusion (dynamic local weighting by feature std plus learnable-query two-stage cross-attention global fusion), instead of relying on weather simulation or data

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use GRCNet instead of RDAMinkNet · SemanticKITTI→SemanticSTFmIoU: 39.5 -> 42.5Helped
Use GRCNet instead of UniMixMinkNet · SynLiDAR→SemanticSTFmIoU: 23.4 -> 23.5Helped
Add GRCNet to SPVCNNSPVCNN · SemanticSTFmIoU: 38.4 -> 40.8Helped
Add GRCNet to MinkNet18/32MinkNet18/32 · SemanticKITTI-CmIoU: 58.6 -> 60.3Helped
Remove reflectance from the input (ablation)MinkNet · SemanticKITTI→SemanticSTFmIoU: 24.4 -> 37.3Helped
Remove reflectance from the input (ablation)MinkNet · SemanticKITTI source domainmIoU: 63.8 -> 62.6Hurt
Add a reflectance encoder and merge features by addition, without CIC or the proposed fusion modules (ablation)GRCNet · SemanticKITTI→SemanticSTFmIoU: 37.3 -> 36.5Hurt
Add CIC to the geometry and reflectance branches (ablation)GRCNet · SemanticKITTI→SemanticSTFmIoU: 36.5 -> 38.6Helped
Add local fusion to the CIC model (ablation)GRCNet · SemanticKITTI→SemanticSTFmIoU: 38.6 -> 41.2Helped
Add global fusion to the CIC and local-fusion model (ablation)GRCNet · SemanticKITTI→SemanticSTFmIoU: 41.2 -> 42.5Helped
Replace the proposed fusion strategy with addition (ablation)GRCNet · SemanticKITTI→SemanticSTFmIoU: 42.5 -> 36.5Hurt
Replace the proposed fusion strategy with gated fusion (ablation)GRCNet · SemanticKITTI→SemanticSTFmIoU: 42.5 -> 37.7Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SemanticKITTI SynLiDAR SemanticSTF SemanticKITTI-C

Benchmarks: SemanticSTF SemanticKITTI-C

Metrics: mIoU

Baselines: MinkNet PolarMix MMD PCL PointDR UniMix RDA SPVCNN

Builds on: MinkowskiNet RDA PointDR variational information bottleneck

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy