atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

Temporally Consistent Object-Centric Learning by Contrasting Slots

CVPR 2025 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Physics-inspired motion prediction · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SLOT CONTRAST, a slot-slot temporal contrastive loss (batch-wide negatives) plus learned slot initialization on a DINOv2-feature recurrent slot attention model, improving temporal consistency and video object discovery on MOVi and YouTube-VIS.

Problem

Unsupervised video object-centric learning often lacks long-term temporal consistency of slot representations across frames, especially on real-world videos with occlusions and interactions.

Approach

Add an InfoNCE-style slot-slot contrastive loss that pulls the same slot across consecutive frames together and pushes apart all other slots in the batch, combined with a learned slot initialization and feature reconstruction of frozen DINOv2 patch features.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add batch slot-slot contrast to feature reconstruction (ablation)SLOT CONTRAST · MOVi-CFG-ARI: 49.7 -> 69.3Helped
Add batch slot-slot contrast to feature reconstruction (ablation)SLOT CONTRAST · MOVi-CmBO: 27.4 -> 32.7Helped
Use intra-video contrast instead of batch slot-slot contrast (ablation)SLOT CONTRAST · MOVi-CFG-ARI: 69.3 -> 54.8Hurt
Add batch slot-slot contrast to feature reconstruction (ablation)SLOT CONTRAST · MOVi-EFG-ARI: 79.8 -> 82.9Helped
Add batch slot-slot contrast to feature reconstruction (ablation)SLOT CONTRAST · YouTube-VISFG-ARI: 35.3 -> 38.0Helped
Use learned rather than random initialization (ablation)Feature Reconstruction · MOVi-EFG-ARI: 71.1 -> 79.8Helped
Use learned rather than random initialization (ablation)SLOT CONTRAST · MOVi-CFG-ARI: 62.9 -> 69.3Helped
Use learned rather than random initialization (ablation)SLOT CONTRAST · MOVi-EFG-ARI: 75.3 -> 82.9Helped
Use learned rather than random initialization (ablation)SLOT CONTRAST · YouTube-VISFG-ARI: 36.1 -> 38.0Helped
Use SLOT CONTRAST rather than VideoSAURv2Object discovery · YouTube-VISFG-ARI: +6.8Helped
Use SLOT CONTRAST rather than VideoSAURv2Object discovery · YouTube-VISmBO: +4Helped
Use SLOT CONTRAST rather than VideoSAURObject discovery · MOVi-CmBO: 38.9 -> 32.7Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MOVi-C MOVi-E YouTube-VIS 2021

Benchmarks: MOVi-C MOVi-E YouTube-VIS 2021

Metrics: FG-ARI mBO image FG-ARI dynamics prediction FG-ARI/mBO

Baselines: SAVi STEVE VideoSAUR VideoSAURv2 SOLV SlotDiffusion LSD DINOSAUR SlotFormer (feature reconstruction) MoToK DIOD

Builds on: Slot Attention SAVi DINOSAUR VideoSAUR SlotFormer InfoNCE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy