atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Neural architecture search

Subnet-Aware Dynamic Supernet Training for Neural Architecture Search

CVPR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Neural architecture search · approach: One-shot and few-shot supernets · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a subnet-aware dynamic supernet training scheme (complexity-aware LR scheduler plus momentum separation) that plugs into N-shot NAS methods to improve ranking consistency and search results.

Problem

Static supernet training in N-shot NAS treats all subnets identically, causing unfairness toward low-complexity subnets and noisy momentum from diverse subnet gradients, which degrades ranking consistency.

Approach

A complexity-aware LR scheduler (CaLR) sets per-subnet LR decay ratios based on parameter count, slowing decay for high-complexity subnets; momentum separation (MS) assigns separate momentum buffers to clusters of subnets sharing an operation on a chosen edge, while weights stay shared.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply CaLR + MSFSNAS-L · ImageNet val (MobileNet space), 475M FLOPstop-1 accuracy (%): 76.8 -> 77.2Helped
Apply CaLR + MSNAS-Bench-201 methods · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet16-120top-1 accuracy: 93.43 ± 0.24 -> 93.63 ± 0.21; 69.49 ± 0.08 -> 71.05 ± 0.17; 42.97 ± 0.52 -> 44.68 ± 0.06Helped
Add CaLR without MS (ablation)SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)Kendall's Tau: 0.751 -> 0.805Helped
Add MS without CaLR (ablation)SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)Kendall's Tau: 0.751 -> 0.772Helped
Add CaLR and MS (ablation)SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)Kendall's Tau: 0.751 -> 0.814Helped
Use a decay ratio proportional to subnet complexity (ablation)SPOS + CaLR · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)CB: 0.76 -> 0.79Hurt
Use a decay ratio inversely proportional to subnet complexity (ablation)SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)CB: 0.76 -> 0.63Helped
Use a decay ratio inversely proportional to subnet complexity (ablation)SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)C3: -0.19 -> -0.09Helped
Cluster subnets randomly for MS (ablation)SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)Kendall's Tau: 0.751±0.008 -> 0.750±0.019No clear effect
Cluster subnets by operation at a selected edge (ablation)SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)Kendall's Tau: 0.751±0.008 -> 0.772±0.007Helped
Increase MS clusters from 5 to 25 (ablation)SPOS + MS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)Kendall's Tau: 0.81±0.024 -> 0.813±0.017Helped
Increase MS clusters from 5 to 125 (ablation)SPOS + MS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201)Kendall's Tau: 0.81±0.024 -> 0.781±0.022Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet16-120

Benchmarks: ImageNet (MobileNet space) NAS-Bench-201 CIFAR-10 NAS-Bench-201 CIFAR-100 NAS-Bench-201 ImageNet16-120

Metrics: top-1 accuracy Kendall's Tau Complexity Bias (CB) Complexity-Convergence Correlation (C3) peak memory GPU hours

Baselines: SPOS FairNAS FSNAS GreedyNAS PA&DA ShiftNAS

Builds on: SPOS FairNAS FSNAS NAS-Bench-201

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy