Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Neural architecture search
Subnet-Aware Dynamic Supernet Training for Neural Architecture Search
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes a subnet-aware dynamic supernet training scheme (complexity-aware LR scheduler plus momentum separation) that plugs into N-shot NAS methods to improve ranking consistency and search results.
Problem
Static supernet training in N-shot NAS treats all subnets identically, causing unfairness toward low-complexity subnets and noisy momentum from diverse subnet gradients, which degrades ranking consistency.
Approach
A complexity-aware LR scheduler (CaLR) sets per-subnet LR decay ratios based on parameter count, slowing decay for high-complexity subnets; momentum separation (MS) assigns separate momentum buffers to clusters of subnets sharing an operation on a chosen edge, while weights stay shared.
Key results
- On the MobileNet space, SPOS-M + Ours reaches 76.7% top-1 vs 76.2% for SPOS-M, and SPOS-L + Ours reaches 77.1% vs 76.6%.
- On NAS-Bench-201 CIFAR-10, SPOS + Ours raises Kendall's Tau from 0.751 to 0.814 and FairNAS + Ours from 0.766 to 0.828.
- Applying the method adds negligible search cost, e.g., peak memory rises from 1875 MB to 1901 MB for SPOS on NAS-Bench-201.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apply CaLR + MS | FSNAS-L · ImageNet val (MobileNet space), 475M FLOPs | top-1 accuracy (%): 76.8 -> 77.2 | Helped |
| Apply CaLR + MS | NAS-Bench-201 methods · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet16-120 | top-1 accuracy: 93.43 ± 0.24 -> 93.63 ± 0.21; 69.49 ± 0.08 -> 71.05 ± 0.17; 42.97 ± 0.52 -> 44.68 ± 0.06 | Helped |
| Add CaLR without MS (ablation) | SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | Kendall's Tau: 0.751 -> 0.805 | Helped |
| Add MS without CaLR (ablation) | SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | Kendall's Tau: 0.751 -> 0.772 | Helped |
| Add CaLR and MS (ablation) | SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | Kendall's Tau: 0.751 -> 0.814 | Helped |
| Use a decay ratio proportional to subnet complexity (ablation) | SPOS + CaLR · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | CB: 0.76 -> 0.79 | Hurt |
| Use a decay ratio inversely proportional to subnet complexity (ablation) | SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | CB: 0.76 -> 0.63 | Helped |
| Use a decay ratio inversely proportional to subnet complexity (ablation) | SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | C3: -0.19 -> -0.09 | Helped |
| Cluster subnets randomly for MS (ablation) | SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | Kendall's Tau: 0.751±0.008 -> 0.750±0.019 | No clear effect |
| Cluster subnets by operation at a selected edge (ablation) | SPOS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | Kendall's Tau: 0.751±0.008 -> 0.772±0.007 | Helped |
| Increase MS clusters from 5 to 25 (ablation) | SPOS + MS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | Kendall's Tau: 0.81±0.024 -> 0.813±0.017 | Helped |
| Increase MS clusters from 5 to 125 (ablation) | SPOS + MS · CIFAR-10 (NAS-Bench-201) | Kendall's Tau: 0.81±0.024 -> 0.781±0.022 | Hurt |
Surprising findings
- Using an opposite-direction LR decay (decay ratio proportional to complexity) degrades CB and C3 relative to the baseline.
- Random clustering for momentum separation gives no gain in Kendall's Tau, while operation-based clustering does.
Limitations
- Not applicable to differentiable NAS methods, which jointly optimize weights and operation coefficients.
- Number of momentum clusters must be tuned; too many clusters (125 or 625) degrade ranking consistency.
Experimental setup
Datasets: ImageNet CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet16-120
Benchmarks: ImageNet (MobileNet space) NAS-Bench-201 CIFAR-10 NAS-Bench-201 CIFAR-100 NAS-Bench-201 ImageNet16-120
Metrics: top-1 accuracy Kendall's Tau Complexity Bias (CB) Complexity-Convergence Correlation (C3) peak memory GPU hours
Baselines: SPOS FairNAS FSNAS GreedyNAS PA&DA ShiftNAS
Builds on: SPOS FairNAS FSNAS NAS-Bench-201
Closest papers by meaning
- Efficient Few-Shot Neural Architecture Search by Counting the Number of Nonlinear Functions (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.93)
- GreedyNAS: Towards Fast One-Shot NAS With Greedy Supernet (CVPR 2020 · similarity 0.92)
- Few-Shot Neural Architecture Search (ICML 2021 · similarity 0.91)
- SUMNAS: Supernet with Unbiased Meta-Features for Neural Architecture Search (ICLR 2022 · similarity 0.91)
- HEP-NAS: Towards Efficient Few-shot Neural Architecture Search via Hierarchical Edge Partitioning (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.91)
- Boosting Order-Preserving and Transferability for Neural Architecture Search: a Joint Architecture Refined Search and Fine-tuning Approach (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.91)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
