atlas

Research map / Video / Action recognition

Stochastic Human Motion Prediction with Memory of Action Transition and Action Characteristic

CVPR 2025 · Video › Action recognition · approach: Action anticipation and latent actions · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes two memory banks (Soft-transition Action Bank and Action Characteristic Bank) plus an Adaptive Attention Adjustment fusion strategy on a CVAE to improve action-driven stochastic human motion prediction.

Problem

Action-driven stochastic human motion prediction must generate smooth transitions between actions with varying speeds and capture action characteristics that are hard to learn when actions are similar.

Approach

Memory banks store action-transition features (queried with top-k soft action recognition from a GRU classifier) and per-action characteristic features; an adaptive weight alpha, driven by a running mean of the recognizer's cross-entropy loss over time, fuses the two retrieved features.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the proposed method instead of WATaction-driven stochastic human motion prediction · GRABAcc: 92.6±0.6 -> 95.23±0.32Helped
Use the proposed method instead of WATaction-driven stochastic human motion prediction · NTUAcc: 76.0±0.2 -> 80.50±0.52Helped
Use the proposed method instead of WATaction-driven stochastic human motion prediction · BABELAcc: 49.6±0.4 -> 55.37±0.38Helped
Use the proposed method instead of WATaction-driven stochastic human motion prediction · HumanAct12Acc: 59.0±0.1 -> 61.57±0.32Helped
Add AAA feature fusion instead of mean query features (ablation)proposed method · GRABAcc: 91.93±0.49 -> 95.23±0.32Helped
Add STAB (ablation)proposed method · GRABAcc: 92.18±0.60 -> 95.23±0.32Helped
Add ACB (ablation)proposed method · GRABAcc: 93.45±0.50 -> 95.23±0.32Helped
Use a running mean when updating α (ablation)proposed method · GRABAcc: 90.84±0.90 -> 95.23±0.32Helped
Use top-1 rather than top-2 STAB categories (ablation)proposed method · GRABAcc: 95.23±0.32 -> 93.03±0.75Hurt
Use top-3 rather than top-2 STAB categories (ablation)proposed method · GRABAcc: 95.23±0.32 -> 93.74±0.59; Divw 1.14±0.04 -> 1.21±0.03Mixed
Use top-4 rather than top-2 STAB categories (ablation)proposed method · GRABAcc: 95.23±0.32 -> 92.57±0.54; Divw 1.14±0.04 -> 1.22±0.03Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GRAB NTU RGB-D BABEL HumanAct12

Benchmarks: GRAB NTU RGB-D BABEL HumanAct12

Metrics: Acc FID Div Div_w (DTW-aligned diversity)

Baselines: Act2Mot DLow ACTOR WAT

Builds on: WAT CVAE DLow

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy