atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

RoboSense: Large-scale Dataset and Benchmark for Egocentric Robot Perception and Navigation in Crowded and Unstructured Environments

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: 3D perception for autonomous driving · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces RoboSense, a large-scale multimodal egocentric dataset (camera, fisheye, LiDAR) from a sweeper robot in crowded, unstructured outdoor scenes, with six benchmark tasks and baselines for detection, tracking, motion prediction and occupancy.

Problem

Existing perception and prediction benchmarks target autonomous driving on roads and highways, leaving egocentric near-field perception for mobile robots navigating crowded, unstructured environments under-served.

Approach

A 360-degree multi-sensor robot platform (4 cameras, 4 fisheye, 4 LiDAR) collects near-field-dense annotated data with track IDs, plus a closest-collision-point distance proportion matching criterion for near-field 3D detection and prediction metrics.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace PointPillar with Transfusion-L for LiDAR 3D detectionRoboSense LiDAR 3D detection · RoboSense validation, Vehicle 3D AP3D AP: 72.5/53.0 -> 83.6/65.1Helped
Add temporal clues with BEVDet4D (ablation)BEVDet · RoboSense validation, Multi-view 3D Detection3D AP: 76.2/30.2 -> 77.2/31.1; 42.3/25.7 -> 42.0/24.8; 47.4/28.5 -> 48.1/29.3Mixed
Add an additional depth prediction branch with point supervision (ablation)BEVDet · RoboSense validation, Multi-view 3D Detection3D AP: 76.2/30.2 -> 77.8/31.3; 42.3/25.7 -> 43.3/27.0; 47.4/28.5 -> 50.1/31.3Helped
Combine 4C and 4F camera layouts instead of using either alone (ablation)BEVDepth multi-view detection · RoboSense validation, 3D AP across [0, 5], [5, 10], and [10, 30]m3D AP: 54.9/16.0 -> 68.9/20.5; 60.1/18.3 -> 75.2/22.9; 53.7/33.1 -> 64.2/38.6Helped
Use multi-modal 8V+4L input instead of 4C+4F cameras (ablation)AB3DMOT · RoboSense validation, 3D MOTsAMOTA: 51.16 -> 43.32Hurt
Use PnPNet instead of ViP3D for motion forecastingRoboSense motion forecasting · RoboSense validationminADE (m): 1.31 -> 0.89Helped
Replace constant-position predictions with PnPNetMotion forecasting with ground-truth boxes · RoboSense validationminADE (m): 2.42 -> 0.89Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RoboSense

Benchmarks: RoboSense

Metrics: 3D AP AOS ASE sAMOTA AMOTP minADE minFDE MR EPA mIoU

Baselines: PointPillar SECOND PV-RCNN Transfusion-L BEVDet BEVDet4D BEVDepth BEVFormer ViP3D PnPNet

Builds on: KITTI nuScenes Waymo Open Dataset AB3DMOT BEVDepth

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy