atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

Remote Photoplethysmography in Real-World and Extreme Lighting Scenarios

CVPR 2025 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Sign language and physiological video analysis · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a lightweight U-shaped video transformer for rPPG that disentangles time-varying lighting interference using a background reference, self-supervised contrastive learning, and frequency/physiological priors, evaluated on RGB outdoor and indoor datasets.

Problem

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) from facial video fails under extreme, time-varying illumination and periodic interference in real-world (outdoor, driving) scenarios.

Approach

Uses the subject background as a reference for interference in a self-supervised contrastive disentanglement over facial and background STMaps, combined with a global-interference-sharing input, a biological-prior sliding-window augmentation (BioSE), a U-shaped Swin video transformer for spatiotemporal reconstruction, and PSD-based frequency constraints, all using RGB only.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use RGB instead of NIR imagingOurs · MR-NIRP-DRV, DayRMSE: 10.93 -> 5.45Helped
Use RGB instead of NIR imagingOurs · MR-NIRP-DRV, NightRMSE: 7.51 -> 3.84Hurt
Add interference disentanglement (ablation)Ours · MR-NIRP-DRVRMSE: 8.12 -> 6.03Helped
Use temporal sampling 80 rather than the full model setting (ablation)Ours · MR-NIRP-DRVRMSE: 6.03 -> 7.16Hurt
Use temporal sampling 160 rather than the full model setting (ablation)Ours · MR-NIRP-DRVRMSE: 6.03 -> 6.80Hurt
Use temporal sampling 640 rather than the full model setting (ablation)Ours · MR-NIRP-DRVRMSE: 6.03 -> 7.46Hurt
Use temporal frequency 2× rather than the full model setting (ablation)Ours · MR-NIRP-DRVRMSE: 6.03 -> 6.68Hurt
Use temporal frequency 4× rather than the full model setting (ablation)Ours · MR-NIRP-DRVRMSE: 6.03 -> 8.09Hurt
Use temporal frequency 8× rather than the full model setting (ablation)Ours · MR-NIRP-DRVRMSE: 6.03 -> 9.12Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: BUAA-MIHR VIPL-HR MR-NIRP-IND MR-NIRP-DRV

Benchmarks: MR-NIRP-IND MR-NIRP-DRV VIPL-HR BUAA-MIHR

Metrics: MAE RMSE Pearson correlation

Baselines: CHROM POS LGI DeepPhys TS-CAN Dual-GAN PFE-TFA NEST ND-DeeprPPG EfficientPhys PhysFormer++ RhythmFormer

Builds on: Swin video transformer ND-DeeprPPG DeeprPPG PhysFormer++ RhythmFormer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy