atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

Radio Frequency Ray Tracing with Neural Object Representation for Enhanced RF Modeling

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: Learning physics from video · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces RFScape, an object-centric neural SDF-plus-material framework integrated into RF ray tracing that predicts WiFi, BLE, 60 GHz and mmWave channels from sparse measurements.

Problem

Conventional RF ray tracing suffers a sim-to-real gap due to crude mesh geometry and homogeneous material assumptions, while neural scene-level RF models like NeRF2 need dense sampling and full retraining when scenes change.

Approach

Learn a per-object neural SDF (structure) and a directional neural attenuation model (material, including interior points) and plug them into sphere-tracing RF ray tracing, so objects can be individually trained, edited, and recomposed in a scene.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use neural object representations instead of scanned meshes for RF ray tracingRFScape · Object-level RF characterizationmedian error: 15.7 dB -> 2.9 dBHelped
Use RFScape rather than NeRF2RF channel prediction · BLE RSSI, small training datasetRSSI error: 1.2 dB betterHelped
Use RFScape rather than NeRF2RF channel prediction · 2.4 GHz WiFi CSI, small training datasetmedian SNR: 5.3 dBHelped
Use RFScape rather than NeRF2RF channel prediction · RFID spectrum, small training datasetSSIM: 0.4498 vs 0.5061Hurt
Use RFScape rather than NeRF2RF channel prediction · mmWave CSISNR: 9.08 dB -> 16.2 dBHelped
Adapt the scene using visual informationRFScape · Dynamic scene adaptationmedian RSSI error: 2.9 dBHelped
Adapt the scene using 3 to 5 new data pointsRFScape · Dynamic scene adaptationmedian RSSI error: 3.2 dBHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NeRF2 dataset (2.4 GHz WiFi CSI, BLE RSSI, RFID spectrum) self-collected 60GHz WiGig CSI self-collected 5GHz WiFi RSSI FMCW mmWave radar object responses

Benchmarks: object-level RF characterization (mmWave radar, rotation stage) room-level channel prediction (WiFi CSI, BLE RSSI, RFID, 60GHz WiGig CSI) dynamics adaptation

Metrics: RSSI error (dB) SNR (dB) SSIM

Baselines: NeRF2 conventional mesh ray tracing (Polycam scanned mesh)

Builds on: NeRF NeRF2 signed distance functions sphere tracing WiNeRT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy