atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

Prior-free 3D Object Tracking

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: Monocular 3D object reconstruction · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes BIT, a prior-free, training-free RGB 3D object tracker that alternates SoftRas-based mesh inverse rendering from SAM masks with SLOT-based pose tracking, iteratively building a reusable 3D model.

Problem

3D object tracking normally needs CAD/reconstructed models or training on pose-annotated data; the paper targets tracking with neither, from monocular RGB only.

Approach

A bidirectional loop: a geometry generation module inverse-renders a mesh from a sphere using SAM masks and tracked poses, while a pose optimization module tracks with that mesh and selects new key frames (by view-angle novelty and bounding-box validity) to feed back into geometry generation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add 3 reference frames (ablation)BIT · MOPEDADD-AUC (0–10 cm): 74.2 -> 86.2Helped
Increase references and key frames from 3/3 to 6/12 (ablation)BIT model generation with Song23 tracking · RBOT Avg.Tracking accuracy: 49.2 -> 77.5Helped
Increase references from 6 to 12 while keeping 12 key frames (ablation)BIT model generation with Song23 tracking · RBOT Avg.Tracking accuracy: 77.5 -> 81.5Helped
Increase references and key frames from 3/3 to 6/12 (ablation)BIT-generated model · RBOTNormalized Hausdorff distance: 0.035 -> 0.011Helped
Increase references from 6 to 12 while keeping 12 key frames (ablation)BIT-generated model · RBOTNormalized Hausdorff distance: 0.011 -> 0.010Helped
Use BIT-generated models instead of GT modelsSong23 · RBOT Avg.Tracking accuracy: 92.4 -> 81.5Hurt
Use BIT-generated models instead of GT modelsSLOT · RBOT Avg.Tracking accuracy: 84.8 -> 68.8Hurt
Use BIT-generated models instead of GT modelsRBOT tracker · RBOT Avg.Tracking accuracy: 72.8 -> 60.0Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MOPED RBOT

Benchmarks: MOPED RBOT

Metrics: ADD-AUC (0-10 cm) 5cm/5deg tracking accuracy normalized Hausdorff distance

Baselines: PoseRBPF LatentFusion PVNet Gen6D RBOT SRT3D RBGT SLOT Song23

Builds on: SLOT SoftRas SAM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy