atlas

Research map / Large language models / Retrieval and knowledge

OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations

CVPR 2025 · Large language models › Retrieval and knowledge · approach: Retrieval-augmented reasoning · 29 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces OmniDocBench, a 981-page, 9-type PDF document parsing benchmark with multi-level annotations and an end-to-end/task/attribute evaluation pipeline, and benchmarks pipeline tools and VLMs on it.

Problem

Existing document parsing benchmarks cover narrow document types, rely on generic text-similarity metrics that poorly assess LaTeX/HTML formulas and tables, and give only overall scores without fine-grained insight.

Approach

A diverse, densely annotated page-level benchmark (19 layout categories, 15 attribute labels, reading order, affiliation, LaTeX/HTML content) paired with a matching-based evaluation pipeline that uses format-specific metrics (CDM, TEDS, normalized edit distance) and an ignore logic for inconsistently-handled components.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use Qwen2-VL-72B instead of the other evaluated parsersdocument parsing · OmniDocBench (9 page types)TextEdit (overall): 0.206 -> 0.179Helped
use MinerU instead of Nougatdocument parsing · OmniDocBench EnglishOverallEdit: 0.452 -> 0.15Helped
use MinerU instead of Nougatdocument parsing · OmniDocBench ChineseOverallEdit: 0.973 -> 0.357Helped
use DocLayout-YOLO instead of the other evaluated layout detectorslayout detection · OmniDocBench layout subsetmAP: 28.84 -> 47.38Helped
use RapidTable instead of the other evaluated table recognizerstable recognition · OmniDocBench table subsetoverall table recognition: 73.6 -> 82.5Helped
use GPT-4o instead of GOT-OCRformula recognition · OmniDocBench formula subsetCDM: 74.1 -> 86.8Helped
use general VLMs rather than pipeline tools on handwritten notesend-to-end text recognition · NotesTextEditMixed
use VLMs rather than pipeline tools on newspapersend-to-end text recognition · NewspaperTextEditHurt
use VLMs on fuzzy scans, watermarks, and colorful backgroundsend-to-end text recognition · Pages with visual degradationsTextEditHelped
use multi-column or complex layouts rather than simpler layoutsreading order prediction · Pages with different layout typesNormalized Edit DistanceHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: OmniDocBench

Benchmarks: OmniDocBench

Metrics: normalized edit distance TEDS CDM BLEU mAP reading order edit distance

Baselines: MinerU Marker Mathpix GOT-OCR Nougat GPT-4o Qwen2-VL-72B InternVL2-76B

Builds on: Nougat GOT-OCR UniMERNet LayoutLMv3 PaddleOCR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy