atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Optimal transport

OPTICAL: Leveraging Optimal Transport for Contribution Allocation in Dataset Distillation

CVPR 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Optimal transport · approach: Neural optimal transport · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes OPTICAL, a plug-and-play dataset distillation add-on that uses a Sinkhorn-approximated optimal transport matrix (on Gaussian-kernel cost) to allocate non-uniform contributions from real to synthetic samples, improving existing synthesis-based distillation methods.

Problem

Existing synthesis-based dataset distillation minimizes a homogeneous distance in which every real instance contributes equally to every synthetic sample, which ignores instance-level pairwise correspondence and intra-class variation.

Approach

Reformulate distance minimization as bi-level matching-and-approximating: estimate a real-to-synthetic contribution matrix via entropic optimal transport (Sinkhorn) using a cost derived from multi-scale Gaussian kernel relevance, then use this non-uniform allocation when optimizing the synthetic set with existing optimization-oriented or DM-based losses.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add OPTICAL contribution allocation to DANCEDANCE · MNIST, FashionMNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100; IPC 1, 10, and 50test accuracy: +0.3 to +1.5Helped
Add OPTICAL contribution allocation to DANCEDANCE · TinyImageNet; IPC 1, 10, and 50test accuracy: +0.5; +0.5; +0.7Helped
Add OPTICAL contribution allocation to M3DM3D · ImageNet-10; IPC 10 and 20test accuracy: +1.3; +1.7Helped
Use the proposed Gaussian kernel instead of N/A, a linear kernel, or a single Gaussian kernel (ablation)DM+OPTICAL · CIFAR-10, IPC 10accuracy: 49.5; 47.8; 49.8 -> 50.2Helped
Vary the entropic regularization parameter 1/λ (ablation)M3D+OPTICAL · CIFAR-100, IPC 50accuracy: 52.2; 52.8; 52.6; 53.0; 52.8; 53.0No clear effect
Vary Sinkhorn iterations T (ablation)M3D+OPTICAL · CIFAR-100, IPC 50accuracy: 52.3; 52.5; 52.8; 53.0; 52.8; 53.0No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MNIST FashionMNIST SVHN CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 TinyImageNet ImageNet-10 ImageNet-100

Benchmarks: MNIST FashionMNIST SVHN CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 TinyImageNet ImageNet-10 ImageNet-100

Metrics: top-1 test accuracy

Baselines: DD LD DC KIP DSA MTT FTD ATT CAFE DataDAM DREAM DM

Builds on: DREAM DM IDM M3D DANCE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy