atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

MultiMorph: On-demand Atlas Construction

CVPR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Dataset condensation and flow estimation · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MultiMorph, a feedforward UNet-based model with a GroupBlock mean-feature-sharing layer and centrality layer that builds unbiased 3D brain atlases in a single forward pass for arbitrary groups and modalities.

Problem

Atlas construction for anatomical populations is computationally slow (days to weeks), so researchers reuse mismatched precomputed atlases; learning-based alternatives need retraining per population or modality.

Approach

A convolutional network with a GroupBlock layer that concatenates each image's features with the group mean at every layer (linear-complexity feature sharing), plus a centrality layer that subtracts the group-mean velocity field, lets a single trained model produce group-specific, unbiased atlases at test time without fine-tuning, aided by synthetic training data for unseen modalities.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MultiMorph instead of baseline atlas construction methodsAtlas construction · IXI T1-w, T2-w, and PD-wDice: 0.913 ± 0.006 vs 0.894 ± 0.015 (T1-w); 0.906 ± 0.007 vs 0.882 ± 0.018 (T2-w); 0.900 ± 0.009 vs 0.884 ± 0.018 (PD-w)Helped
Use MultiMorph instead of baseline atlas construction methodsAtlas construction · IXI T1-w, T2-w, and PD-wConstruction time (min.): 10.50 vs 325.20 (T1-w); 10.40 vs 261.00 (T2-w); 7.80 vs 163.80 (PD-w)Helped
Use MultiMorph instead of baseline atlas construction methodsAtlas construction · IXI subgroupsDice Transfer: 0.904 ± 0.002 vs 0.893 ± 0.005Helped
Use MultiMorph instead of baseline atlas construction methodsAtlas construction · OASIS-3 T1-w testDice Transfer: 0.910 ± 0.014 vs 0.886 ± 0.017Helped
Add the centrality layer (ablation)MultiMorph · OASIS-1 testCentrality: 16125 ± 11494 -> 12.0 ± 39.48Helped
Add the GroupBlock mechanism (ablation)MultiMorph · OASIS-1 testDice Transfer: 0.870 ± 0.021 -> 0.884 ± 0.020Helped
Replace mean GroupBlock summary with variance (ablation)MultiMorph · OASIS-1 testDice Transfer: 0.884 ± 0.020 -> 0.883 ± 0.020No clear effect
Replace mean GroupBlock summary with max (ablation)MultiMorph · OASIS-1 testDice Transfer: 0.884 ± 0.020 -> 0.880 ± 0.019No clear effect
Add the Dice loss (ablation)MultiMorph · OASIS-1 testDice Transfer: 0.884 ± 0.020 -> 0.919 ± 0.011Helped
Train with synthetic data (ablation)MultiMorph · IXIDice: up to 1.8 Dice pointsHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: OASIS-1 OASIS-3 Mind Brain Body (MBB) IXI SynthSeg synthetic images

Benchmarks: IXI OASIS-3 OASIS-1

Metrics: Dice run time (min) folds (Jacobian determinant < 0) centrality (mean displacement norm) segmentation transfer Dice

Baselines: ANTs SyGN AtlasMorph Aladdin TAG

Builds on: UNet SynthMorph AtlasMorph SyGN Aladdin

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy