atlas

Research map / Video / Video generation

MotiF: Making Text Count in Image Animation with Motion Focal Loss

CVPR 2025 · Video › Video generation · approach: Diffusion-based human image animation · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Motion Focal Loss (MotiF), which reweights the diffusion loss by optical-flow motion heatmaps to make a text-to-video backbone focus on moving regions for text-guided image animation, and introduces the TI2V-Bench human-evaluated benchmark.

Problem

Text-image-to-video (TI2V) models often ignore the text motion description and over-rely on the conditioning image (conditional image leakage), producing videos with weak text alignment and limited motion.

Approach

Instead of adding motion priors as inputs, add a training-objective term that weights the diffusion loss by an optical-flow-derived motion heatmap, so the model concentrates learning on high-motion regions; no extra inputs are needed at inference.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply Motion Focal loss using optical-flow motion heatmapsVideoCrafter2 TI2V model · TI2V-Benchaverage human preference: 72%Helped
Add Motion Focal loss (ablation)VideoCrafter2 TI2V model · TI2V-BenchTI2V Score: 63.1/36.9Helped
Replace Motion Focal loss with inverse-motion loss (ablation)VideoCrafter2 TI2V model · TI2V-BenchTI2V Score: 61.9/38.1Hurt
Add cross-attention image conditioning alongside concatenation (ablation)VideoCrafter2 TI2V model · TI2V-BenchTI2V Score: 58.1/41.9Hurt
Replace image concatenation with cross-attention conditioning (ablation)VideoCrafter2 TI2V model · TI2V-BenchTI2V Score: 92.2/7.8Hurt
Use Motion Focal loss rather than standard diffusion loss aloneVideoCrafter2 TI2V model · TI2V-Benchhuman preference versus prior methods: 68.8; 68.1; 84.7; 62.5; 72.5; 77.2; 66.6; 86.6; 60.3Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: internal licensed 1M video-text pairs Animate Bench

Benchmarks: TI2V-Bench Animate Bench

Metrics: TI2V score (human A-B preference) image alignment text alignment motion/justification selection rates diffusion loss ratio in high-motion regions

Baselines: DynamiCrafter VideoCrafter Cinemo I2VGen-XL SEINE Cond-leak TI2V-Zero AnimateAnything ConsistI2V

Builds on: VideoCrafter2 focal loss RAFT JUICE human evaluation protocol

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy