atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Class-incremental

Incremental Object Keypoint Learning

CVPR 2025 · Continual learning › Class-incremental · approach: Incremental object detection with replay · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces Incremental object Keypoint Learning (IKL), where new keypoints are learned from data labeled only with new keypoints without retaining old data, and proposes the exemplar-free two-stage KAMP baseline that uses a KA-Net and a keypoint-oriented spatial distillation loss.

Problem

Pretrained keypoint estimators cannot detect newly defined keypoints at test time, and retraining with all keypoint labels is costly; incremental learning for keypoint regression with only new-keypoint labels (label non-co-occurrence) has not been studied.

Approach

A two-stage scheme: Stage-I trains an auxiliary KA-Net to predict an old keypoint from nearby new keypoint heatmaps and visual features (pseudo-labeled by the old model); Stage-II distills old keypoints with a spatial-softmax keypoint-oriented distillation loss plus KA-Net distillation while learning new keypoints, enabling positive transfer to old keypoints.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
apply KAMP instead of LWFHRNet · Split MPIIAAA4: 75.75 -> 79.93Helped
apply KAMP instead of the strongest listed baselineHRNet · Split Head-2023A-MRE4: 3.71 -> 2.32Helped
apply KAMP instead of the strongest listed baselineHRNet · Split ATRWAAA3: 89.34 -> 93.16Helped
apply KAMP instead of the strongest listed baselineHRNet · Split ChestA-MRE1: 6.35 -> 5.67Helped
replace LWF's keypoint-wise normalization with keypoint-oriented spatial distillation ℓKSD (ablation)KAMP on Split MPII · Split MPIIAAA4: 75.75 -> 76.93Helped
add a randomly constructed KA-Net task (ablation)KAMP on Split MPII · Split MPIIAAA4: 76.93 -> 77.13Helped
use physical knowledge to construct the KA-Net task instead of random construction (ablation)KAMP on Split MPII · Split MPIIAAA4: 77.13 -> 79.93Helped
incrementally apply KAMP to MetaPoint+MetaPoint+ on Split MPII · Split MPIIPCK [10]: 65.71 -> 73.49Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Head-2023 (Cephalometric, MICCAI 2023) Chest MPII ATRW

Benchmarks: Split Chest Split Head-2023 Split MPII Split ATRW

Metrics: MRE PCK average accuracy (AAA) average transfer (AT) maximal transfer (MT)

Baselines: EWC RW MAS LWF AFEC CPR SFD WF GBD CC2D EGT UKL

Builds on: LWF HRNet CAPE CHF

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy