atlas

Research map / Image generation / Editing and style transfer

Generative Image Layer Decomposition with Visual Effects

CVPR 2025 · Image generation › Editing and style transfer · approach: Inversion-based diffusion editing · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes LayerDecomp, a diffusion-transformer framework that decomposes an image with an object mask into a clean background and a transparent RGBA foreground that keeps shadows and reflections, trained on simulated triplets plus camera-captured pairs with a pixel-space consistency loss.

Problem

Decomposing a single image into editable layers (clean background and transparent foreground) while faithfully preserving transparent visual effects such as shadows and reflections, without ground-truth layer annotations for real images.

Approach

A DiT generates background and RGBA foreground latents jointly from the composite image and object mask; for real data lacking foreground ground truth, a pixel-space consistency loss requires the alpha-blended re-composite of the predicted layers to match the input image.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add an RGBA foreground layer containing the object (ablation)LayerDecomp · Held-out test set, BGPSNR: 28.21 -> 28.28Helped
add visual effects to the RGBA foreground layer (ablation)LayerDecomp · Held-out test set, CompPSNR: 27.53 -> 28.66Helped
add consistency loss (ablation)LayerDecomp · Held-out test set, CompPSNR: 28.66 -> 30.53Helped
use LayerDecomp instead of mask-based inpaintingobject removal · RORDPSNR: 24.56L24.79T vs. 20.45L22.01THelped
use LayerDecomp instead of mask-based inpaintingobject removal · MULANFID: 39.26 vs. 55.80Helped
use LayerDecomp instead of mask-based inpaintingshadow removal · DESOBAv2PSNRm: 38.57T vs. 36.94LHelped
use LayerDecomp for object removal instead of Emu-Editinstruction-driven object removal · Emu-Edit Remove Setoverall preference: 5.00% vs. 57.08% (removal effectiveness); 4.79% vs. 83.54% (overall)Helped
use LayerDecomp for object moving instead of DesignEditobject spatial editing · Moving user studyoverall preference: 2.22% vs. 94.44%Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: simulated multi-layer triplets (100k foreground assets, 5M backgrounds) camera-captured image pairs (6,000) RORD MULAN DESOBAv2 Emu-Edit Remove Set

Benchmarks: RORD MULAN DESOBAv2 Emu-Edit Remove Set

Metrics: PSNR LPIPS FID CLIP-FID masked PSNR masked SSIM user preference

Baselines: ControlNet Inpainting SD-XL Inpainting PowerPaint ObjectDrop Emu-Edit MGIE OmniGen DiffEditor DragAnything DesignEdit DiffusionHandle

Builds on: diffusion transformer LayerDiffusion ObjectDrop MULAN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy