atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

FineVQ: Fine-Grained User Generated Content Video Quality Assessment

CVPR 2025 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Video restoration with temporal priors · 29 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces FineVD, a 6104-video UGC quality dataset with multi-dimensional MOS, degradation labels and descriptions, and FineVQ, an LMM-based model (InternViT + SlowFast motion encoder + InternLM-8B with LoRA) that rates, scores and describes quality per dimension.

Problem

Existing UGC video quality assessment databases and models provide only an overall quality score, lacking fine-grained, multi-dimensional quality labels, attributions and descriptions needed for processing and recommendation.

Approach

Builds a lab-annotated multi-dimensional UGC VQA dataset with MOS, distortion-type and description labels, and an instruction-tuned large multimodal model with spatial and motion encoders and LoRA adaptation that handles quality rating, scoring and attribution in a single model.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add motion features to spatial features (ablation)FineVQ · FineVD; LIVE-VQC; YouTube-UGCSRCC: 0.8210 -> 0.8264; 0.7832 -> 0.8061; 0.8084 -> 0.8349Helped
add vision-encoder LoRA rank 8 (ablation)FineVQ with spatial and motion features · FineVD; LIVE-VQC; YouTube-UGCSRCC: 0.8264 -> 0.8345; 0.8061 -> 0.8207; 0.8349 -> 0.8442Helped
add language-model LoRA rank 8 (ablation)FineVQ with spatial and motion features · FineVD; LIVE-VQC; YouTube-UGCSRCC: 0.8264 -> 0.8365; 0.8061 -> 0.8224; 0.8349 -> 0.8640Helped
use LoRA rank 8 on both vision encoder and language model (ablation)FineVQ · FineVD; LIVE-VQC; YouTube-UGCSRCC: 0.8365 -> 0.8838; 0.8224 -> 0.8624; 0.8640 -> 0.8921Helped
increase LoRA rank from 8 to 16 (ablation)FineVQ with both LoRA adaptations · FineVD; LIVE-VQC; YouTube-UGCSRCC: 0.8838 -> 0.8887; 0.8624 -> 0.8951; 0.8921 -> 0.9107Helped
use one FineVQ model for quality attribution instead of the compared general LMMsFineVQ · FineVD quality attribute predictionaccuracy: 91.93%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: FineVD KoNViD-1k YouTube-UGC LIVE-VQC LSVQ LIVE-YT-Gaming

Benchmarks: FineVD LIVE-YT-Gaming KoNViD-1k YouTube-UGC LIVE-VQC LSVQ test LSVQ 1080p

Metrics: SRCC PLCC KRCC accuracy

Baselines: NIQE QAC HOSA TLVQM VIDEVAL RAPIQUE VSFA GSTVQA SimpleVQA FAST-VQA DOVER VideoLLaMA2

Builds on: LoRA InternVL SlowFast instruction tuning

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy