atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

FedBiP: Heterogeneous One-Shot Federated Learning with Personalized Latent Diffusion Models

CVPR 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Personalized and heterogeneous FL · approach: Federated learning with pretrained models · 14 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FedBiP, which personalizes a pretrained Stable Diffusion LDM at instance level (client latents with noise) and concept level (learned domain/category textual concept vectors) to synthesize client-aligned training data for heterogeneous one-shot federated learning.

Problem

One-shot federated learning with feature-space and label-space heterogeneity and scarce client data; directly prompting pretrained LDMs yields synthetic images with large distribution shifts from client data, especially in rare domains like medical imaging.

Approach

Instead of uploading data or model weights, each client uploads privacy-perturbed noised latents (interpolated same-class latents plus T-step noise) and optimized domain/category concept embeddings; the server generates client-aligned synthetic images with the frozen pretrained LDM and trains a classifier on them.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use FedBiP-L instead of the strongest baseline, Central (oracle)OSFL classification · DomainNet Avgaccuracy: 73.42 ±0.53 -> 67.82 ±0.56Hurt
use FedBiP-L instead of the strongest baseline, Central (oracle)OSFL classification · PACS Avgaccuracy: 67.32 ±2.36 -> 62.67 ±0.45Hurt
use FedBiP-L instead of the strongest baseline, Central (oracle)OSFL classification · OfficeHome Avgaccuracy: 64.38 ±1.06 -> 61.52 ±0.39Hurt
use FedBiP-L instead of the strongest baseline, Central (oracle)OSFL classification · UCM IID, Dir0.5, Dir0.01accuracy: 68.44 ±0.52 -> 65.59 ±1.01; 68.44 ±0.52 -> 64.41 ±0.88; 68.44 ±0.52 -> 59.84 ±0.47Hurt
use FedBiP-L instead of the strongest baseline, Central (oracle)OSFL classification · DermaMNIST IID, Dir0.5, Dir0.01accuracy: 60.08 ±0.98 -> 56.10 ±1.34; 60.08 ±0.98 -> 55.03 ±1.02; 60.08 ±0.98 -> 48.15 ±1.67Hurt
add instance-level personalization to concept-level personalization (ablation)FedBiP · DomainNet/PACS/OfficeHome Avgaccuracy: 63.96 -> 67.82; 60.08 -> 62.67; 56.32 -> 61.52Helped
add domain concept personalization (ablation)FedBiP · DomainNet/PACS/OfficeHome Avgaccuracy: 61.71 -> 67.82; 59.15 -> 62.67; 55.81 -> 61.52Helped
add category concept personalization (ablation)FedBiP · DomainNet/PACS/OfficeHome Avgaccuracy: 61.71 -> 67.82; 59.15 -> 62.67; 55.81 -> 61.52Helped
add domain concept personalization rather than category concept personalization alone (ablation)FedBiP · DomainNet/PACS/OfficeHome Avgaccuracy: 63.96 -> 66.08; 60.08 -> 61.83; 56.32 -> 59.35Helped
perturb the domain concept vector (ablation)FedBiP · DomainNet/PACS/OfficeHome Avgaccuracy: 67.09 -> 67.82; 62.78 -> 62.67; 60.84 -> 61.52Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DomainNet PACS OfficeHome DermaMNIST UC Merced Land Use Dataset

Benchmarks: DomainNet PACS OfficeHome DermaMNIST UC Merced Land Use Dataset

Metrics: classification accuracy membership inference attack entropy and loss gap

Baselines: FedAvg Central (oracle) FedD3 DENSE FedDEO FGL

Builds on: Latent Diffusion Model textual inversion FGL FedDEO DENSE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy