atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

F^3OCUS - Federated Finetuning of Vision-Language Foundation Models with Optimal Client Layer Updating Strategy via Multi-objective Meta-Heuristics

CVPR 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Personalized and heterogeneous FL · approach: Federated prompt and LoRA tuning · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes F3OCUS, a federated PEFT method that selects VLM layers per client via LNTK principal-eigenvalue importance and refines the selection on the server with multi-objective meta-heuristics, and releases the MedVQA-FL / Ultra-MedVQA dataset.

Problem

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large vision-language models on resource-constrained, heterogeneous clients in federated learning, where naive client-local layer selection ignores other clients and slows convergence.

Approach

Client-side layer importance from the principal eigenvalue of layerwise Neural Tangent Kernels, plus a data-free server-side multi-objective meta-heuristic that jointly maximizes cumulative importance and minimizes variance of layer-selection counts across clients.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add server-level multi-objective layer selection to LNTK-based client selectionLNTK adapter-layer selection · Tasks 1–6, homogeneous resources, ViLTmean score: 65.48 -> 69.00Helped
Add server-level multi-objective layer selection to LNTK-based client selectionLNTK adapter-layer selection · Tasks 1–6, homogeneous resources, LLaVAmean score: 69.33 -> 72.52Helped
Add server-level multi-objective layer selection to LNTK-based client selectionLNTK adapter-layer selection · Tasks 1–6, homogeneous resources, BLIPmean score: 69.15 -> 72.16Helped
Add server-level multi-objective layer selection to LNTK-based client selectionLNTK adapter-layer selection · Tasks 1–6, heterogeneous resources, ViLTmean score: 65.48 -> 68.78Helped
Add server-level multi-objective layer selection to LNTK-based client selectionLNTK adapter-layer selection · Tasks 1–6, heterogeneous resources, LLaVAmean score: 69.76 -> 72.46Helped
Add server-level multi-objective layer selection to LNTK-based client selectionLNTK adapter-layer selection · Tasks 1–6, heterogeneous resources, BLIPmean score: 69.29 -> 72.36Helped
Use F³OCUS instead of LNTK for VLM layer selectionViLT and BLIP layer selection · Tasks 1–6, heterogeneous resourcesaccuracy/F1-score: +5.35% and +5.33% respectively for homogeneous and heterogeneous device settings over all architecturesHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SLAKE VQA-RAD VQA-Med 2019 VQA-Med 2020 VQA-Med 2021 Open-I MIMIC CT Ultrasound Dermatoscopy Fundus Histology

Benchmarks: SLAKE VQA-RAD VQA-Med 2019 VQA-Med 2020 VQA-Med 2021 Ultra-MedVQA Open-I MIMIC

Metrics: accuracy F1-score communication MBits GFLOPs trainable parameters (M)

Baselines: FedDAT LoRA FedAvg adapters (All adapters) Federated Dropout Magnitude pruning FishMask GradFlow GraSP SNIP Synflow RGN Fedselect

Builds on: FedAvg Neural Tangent Kernel Adapter tuning SNIP FedDAT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy