atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

FIRE: Robust Detection of Diffusion-Generated Images via Frequency-Guided Reconstruction Error

CVPR 2025 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Reconstruction-based diffusion image detection · 13 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FIRE, which detects diffusion-generated images by comparing autoencoder reconstruction error before and after removing learned mid-frequency bands, trained end-to-end with a ResNet-50 classifier.

Problem

Detecting images generated by diffusion models, especially generalizing to unseen generators and robustness to perturbations, where existing reconstruction-error detectors generalize poorly.

Approach

Observes that diffusion models struggle to reconstruct mid-band frequencies of real images; a learned Frequency Mask Refinement module isolates these bands, creates a pseudo-generated image by removing them, and a classifier uses the change in autoencoder reconstruction error (original vs. pseudo-generated) with end-to-end training.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FIRE instead of FakeInversionImage detector · Newer generation models, LAION + DALL·E 3 trainingAUC: +3.2% AUCHelped
Use FIRE instead of FakeInversionImage detector · Newer generation models, LAION + DALL·E 3 trainingACC: +4.6% ACCHelped
Use FIRE instead of FakeInversionImage detector · Newer generation models, LAION + Kandinsky 3 trainingAUC: +7.6% AUCHelped
Use FIRE instead of FakeInversionImage detector · Newer generation models, LAION + Kandinsky 3 trainingACC: +7.3% ACCHelped
Use preset frequency mask #5 instead of mask #1 (ablation)FIRE · DALL·E 3AUC: 58.5 -> 78.3Helped
Use preset frequency mask #5 instead of mask #2 (ablation)FIRE · DALL·E 3AUC: 73.4 -> 78.3Helped
Use preset frequency mask #5 instead of mask #3 (ablation)FIRE · DALL·E 3AUC: 62.7 -> 78.3Helped
Use preset frequency mask #5 instead of mask #4 (ablation)FIRE · DALL·E 3AUC: 76.5 -> 78.3Helped
Add the mask refinement loss Lmask (ablation)FIRE · DALL·E 3AUC: 68.3 -> 78.3Helped
Add the mid-frequency reconstruction alignment loss Lmid rec (ablation)FIRE · DALL·E 3AUC: 54.3 -> 78.3Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DiffusionForensics LAION Midjourney-prompted generated images

Benchmarks: DiffusionForensics self-collected LAION + DALL-E 3 / Kandinsky 3 benchmark

Metrics: AUC ACC

Baselines: CNNDet AEROBLADE DIRE FakeInversion

Builds on: DIRE AEROBLADE FakeInversion ResNet-50

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy