atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

EffiDec3D: An Optimized Decoder for High-Performance and Efficient 3D Medical Image Segmentation

CVPR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › CNN design · approach: Dense matching and estimation CNNs · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes EffiDec3D, a lightweight 3D segmentation decoder that uniformly reduces channels to the minimum encoder channel count and stops upsampling at half resolution, cutting parameters and FLOPs by over 80% with comparable Dice across 12 medical tasks.

Problem

3D medical segmentation networks such as SwinUNETR, SwinUNETRv2, and 3D UX-Net have high #Params and #FLOPs, largely due to decoder designs with high-resolution layers and large channel counts, limiting real-time and resource-constrained use.

Approach

Replace the heavy decoder with a uniform channel count (the minimum encoder stage channel count, 48 in 3D UX-Net) using residual conv blocks, and limit upsampling to half input resolution followed by a 1x1x1 prediction head and trilinear upsampling, so that the costly full-resolution stages are removed while Dice is largely preserved.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace the 3D UX-Net decoder with EffiDec3D3D UX-Net · FeTA 2021 testaverage DICE (%): 87.28% to 87.97%Helped
replace the SwinUNETRv2 decoder with EffiDec3DSwinUNETRv2 · MSD 10 tasks validation10-task average DICE (%): 73.83% to 74.71%Helped
replace the decoder with EffiDec3D3D UX-Net · BTCV validationaverage DICE (%): 79.74% to 79.25%Hurt
replace the decoder with EffiDec3DSwinUNETRv2 · BTCV validationaverage DICE (%): 81.26% to 80.52%Hurt
reduce output resolution from (D, H, W) to (D/2, H/2, W/2) (ablation)channel-optimized 3D UX-Net · BTCV validationaverage DICE (%): 79.44% to 79.25%Hurt
reduce output resolution to (D/4, H/4, W/4) (ablation)channel-optimized 3D UX-Net · BTCV validationaverage DICE (%): 79.25% to 76.41%Hurt
reduce output resolution to (D/8, H/8, W/8) (ablation)channel-optimized 3D UX-Net · BTCV validationaverage DICE (%): 79.25% to 70.77%Hurt
reduce output resolution to (D/16, H/16, W/16) (ablation)channel-optimized 3D UX-Net · BTCV validationaverage DICE (%): 79.25% to 51.22%Hurt
set decoder channels to 16 (ablation)EffiDec3D on 3D UX-Net · BTCV validationDICE (%): 79.25 to 77.25Hurt
set decoder channels to 24 (ablation)EffiDec3D on 3D UX-Net · BTCV validationDICE (%): 79.25 to 78.69Hurt
set decoder channels to 32 (ablation)EffiDec3D on 3D UX-Net · BTCV validationDICE (%): 79.25 to 78.47Hurt
set decoder channels to 40 (ablation)EffiDec3D on 3D UX-Net · BTCV validationDICE (%): 79.25 to 78.73Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: FeTA 2021 BTCV 13-organ MSD 10 tasks

Benchmarks: FeTA 2021 BTCV MSD

Metrics: DICE HD95 MParams GFLOPs

Baselines: 3D UX-Net SwinUNETR SwinUNETRv2 MedNeXt M K3 nnUNet nnFormer TransBTS UNETR++ SegFormer3D SlimUNETR UNETR

Builds on: 3D UX-Net SwinUNETR SwinUNETRv2 UNETR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy