atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

Disentangling Safe and Unsafe Image Corruptions via Anisotropy and Locality

CVPR 2025 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: Biologically inspired robust vision · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Projected Displacement (PD), an anisotropic, local threat model that measures perturbation threat by alignment with data-derived unsafe directions, separating safe common corruptions from label-changing ones on ImageNet.

Problem

Standard isotropic, global threat models such as l_p norms cannot distinguish safe common corruptions (blur, noise, compression, occlusion) that preserve the label from unsafe perturbations that change it, making robustness specifications misspecified.

Approach

Define threat as the maximal scaled projection of a perturbation onto unsafe directions, where unsafe directions are estimated locally per input from training samples of other classes (via k-center representatives); the resulting sublevel sets are convex and enable projected attacks, and can be extended with segmentation masks and class-hierarchy weights.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Evaluate with the PD threat instead of the d∞ threatImageNet-1k benchmark classifiers · ImageNet-1k classification, ε = 16/255robust accuracy: 0.25 -> 0.32; 0.12 -> 0.21; 0.1 -> 0.19; 0.09 -> 0.19; 0.05 -> 0.13; 0.04 -> 0.17Helped
Use segmentation-aware PD-S threat instead of PD threatImageNet-1k benchmark classifiers · ImageNet-1k classification, ε = 16/255robust accuracy: 0.32 -> 0.31; 0.21 -> 0.20; 0.19 -> 0.18; 0.19 -> 0.19; 0.13 -> 0.12; 0.17 -> 0.18No clear effect
Use concept-aware PD-W threat instead of PD threatImageNet-1k benchmark classifiers · ImageNet-1k classification, ε = 16/255robust accuracy: 0.32 -> 0.31; 0.21 -> 0.21; 0.19 -> 0.18; 0.19 -> 0.19; 0.13 -> 0.12; 0.17 -> 0.18No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet-1k ImageNet-C Imagenet-bar-C

Benchmarks: ImageNet-1k ImageNet-C Imagenet-bar-C RobustBench

Metrics: average threat robust accuracy

Baselines: l_inf threat model l_2 threat model DreamSim perceptual threat

Builds on: AutoAttack DreamSim ImageNet-C Imagenet-bar-C SAM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy