atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Black-box and transfer attacks

Data-free Universal Adversarial Perturbation with Pseudo-semantic Prior

CVPR 2025 · Adversarial robustness and security › Black-box and transfer attacks · approach: Transfer attacks on face recognition · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes PSP-UAP, a data-free universal adversarial perturbation method that treats the UAP itself (plus noise) as a pseudo-semantic prior, sampling cropped regions with input transformations and KL-based sample reweighting.

Problem

Data-free universal adversarial perturbations generated from random noise lack semantic content, which limits their black-box transferability to unseen CNN models.

Approach

Use the generated UAP plus random noise as a pseudo-semantic prior: randomly crop and resize regions of it to create semantic samples, apply input transformations (rotation, scaling, shuffling) that become effective due to the semantic content, and reweight samples by the inverse KL divergence so hard-to-fool samples get more weight.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use pseudo-semantic samples cropped from the UAP instead of random noise (ablation)Data-free UAP training · ImageNet validationFR (%)Helped
Add sample reweighting for semantic samples (ablation)PSP-UAP · ImageNet validationFR (%)Helped
Apply input transformations to semantic samples (ablation)PSP-UAP · ImageNet validationFR (%)Helped
Combine sample reweighting with input transformation (ablation)PSP-UAP · ImageNet validationFR (%)Helped
Apply input transformation directly to random noise rather than semantic samples (ablation)Data-free UAP training · ImageNet validationaverage FR (%)Hurt
Use PSP-UAP instead of AT-UAP-UImageNet classification attacks · ImageNet validation, average across five CNNsFR (%): 87.95 -> 89.95Helped
Use PSP-UAP instead of TRM-UAPUniversal attacks on additional CNNs · ImageNet validation, average across four additional CNNsaverage FR (%): 56.57 -> 64.13Helped
Use PSP-UAP instead of TRM-UAPUniversal attacks on GoogleNet · ImageNet validation, black-box transfer from GoogleNetaverage FR (%): 72.78 -> 72.39Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet

Benchmarks: ImageNet validation set

Metrics: fooling rate

Baselines: FFF GD-UAP PD-UA Cosine-UAP AT-UAP TRM-UAP SGA-UAP AAA

Builds on: GD-UAP TRM-UAP L2T Cosine-UAP DIM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy