atlas

Research map / Image generation / Image restoration

Complementary Advantages: Exploiting Cross-Field Frequency Correlation for NIR-Assisted Image Denoising

CVPR 2025 · Image generation › Image restoration · approach: Raw and low-light noise modeling · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FCENet, a two-stage frequency-domain network that uses a measured NIR-RGB frequency correlation prior to dynamically select and fuse complementary NIR and RGB features for NIR-assisted image denoising.

Problem

NIR-assisted RGB image denoising is hard because NIR and RGB images are inconsistent in color, brightness, and structure, and existing fusion methods either fuse indiscriminately or discard differential information (e.g., NIR sharp textures and RGB colors).

Approach

A cross-field frequency correlation prior (NIR is more similar to clean RGB at high frequencies, noisy RGB at low frequencies) motivates a frequency dynamic selection mechanism (FDSM) that filters each field's features with input-conditioned frequency filters, and a frequency exhaustive fusion mechanism (FEFM) combining frequency-domain cross-attention for common features with differential cross-a

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FCENet instead of NIR-RestormerNIR-assisted denoising · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 29.81 -> 30.37Helped
Add FDSM to the two-stage U-Net baseline (ablation)FCENet · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 29.13 -> 29.64Helped
Add FEFM to the two-stage U-Net baseline (ablation)FCENet · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 29.13 -> 29.96Helped
Add both FDSM and FEFM (ablation)FCENet · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 29.13 -> 30.37Helped
Use frequency dynamic selection instead of spatial dynamic selection (ablation)FCENet FDSM · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 30.11 -> 30.37Helped
Add FDSM rather than remove it (ablation)FCENet · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 29.96 -> 30.37Helped
Replace direct feature summation with cross-attention (ablation)FCENet FEFM · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 29.64 -> 29.85Helped
Use DFR instead of direct feature summation (ablation)FCENet FEFM · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 29.64 -> 30.15Helped
Add CFR to DFR (ablation)FCENet FEFM · DVD test, σ = 4PSNR: 30.15 -> 30.37Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DVD IVRG

Benchmarks: DVD IVRG

Metrics: PSNR SSIM FLOPs Params

Baselines: Uformer Restormer MPRNet Xformer CUNet SANet MNNet DVN NIR-Restormer

Builds on: Restormer SAM (supervised attention module from MPRNet) Charbonnier loss frequency domain loss FSAS frequency self-attention

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy